EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 31 / No 3 (June 2026) Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci., 31 3 (2026) 205-216 References
Open Access
Issue
Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci.
Volume 31, Number 3, June 2026
Page(s) 205 - 216
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/wujns/2026313205
Published online 24 June 2026
  1. Elad M, Aharon M. Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over learned dictionaries[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2006, 15(12): 3736-3745. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mairal J, Bach F, Ponce J. Non-local sparse models for image restoration[C]//Proc IEEE 12th Int Conf Comput Vis. New York: IEEE, 2009: 2272-2279. [Google Scholar]
  3. Buades A, Coll B, Morel J M. A non-local algorithm for image denoising[C]//2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05). New York: IEEE, 2005: 60-65. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang J, Zhao D, Gao W, et al. Group-based sparse representation for image restoration[J]. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2014, 23(8): 3336-3351. [Google Scholar]
  5. Srebro N, Jaakkola T. Weighted low-rank approximations[C]// Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML'03. Cambridge: AAAI Press, 2003: 720-727. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hu Y, Zhang D B, Ye J P, et al. Fast and accurate matrix completion via truncated nuclear norm regularization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2013, 35(9): 2117-2130. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zha Z Y, Yuan X, Wen B H, et al. From rank estimation to rank approximation: Rank residual constraint for image restoration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2020, 29: 3254-3269. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zha Z Y, Liu X, Zhou Z H, et al. Image denoising via group sparsity residual constraint[C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). New York: IEEE, 2017: 1787-1791. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gu S H, Zhang L, Zuo W M, et al. Weighted nuclear norm minimization with application to image denoising[C]//2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New York: IEEE, 2014: 2862-2869. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zha Z Y, Yuan X, Wen B H, et al. Group sparsity residual constraint with non-local priors for image restoration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2020, 29: 8960-8975. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang T, Li W Y, Wu D, et al. Group sparsity residual constraint model with weighted log-sum penalty for image restoration[J]. Signal Processing, 2024, 222: 109536. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ning W, Sun D, Gao Q W, et al. Natural image restoration based on multi-scale group sparsity residual constraints[J]. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2023, 17: 1293161. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dabov K, Foi A, Katkovnik V, et al. Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2007, 16(8): 2080-2095. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dong W S, Zhang L, Shi G M, et al. Nonlocally centralized sparse representation for image restoration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2013, 22(4): 1620-1630. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dong W S, Shi G M, Li X. Nonlocal image restoration with bilateral variance estimation: A low-rank approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2013, 22(2): 700-711. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zoran D, Weiss Y. From learning models of natural image patches to whole image restoration[C]//2011 International Conference on Computer Vision. New York: IEEE, 2012: 479-486. [Google Scholar]
  17. Xu J, Zhang L, Zuo W M, et al. Patch group based nonlocal self-similarity prior learning for image denoising[C]//2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). New York: IEEE, 2016: 244-252. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.