Open Access
Issue
Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci.
Volume 31, Number 3, June 2026
Page(s) 269 - 280
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/wujns/2026313269
Published online 24 June 2026
  1. Baczyński M, Jayaram B. Fuzzy Implications[M]. Berlin: Springer-verlag, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cintula P, Hájek P, Noguera C. Handbook of Mathematical Fuzzy Logic[M]. London: College Publications, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  3. Król A. Dependencies between fuzzy conjunctions and implications[C]//Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology. Paris: Atlantis Press, 2011: 230-237. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mas M, Monserrat M, Torrens J, et al. A survey on fuzzy implication functions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2007, 15(6): 1107-1121. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kacprzyk J, Pedrycz W. Spring Handbook of Computational Intelligence[M]. Berlin: Springer-verlag, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang C, Qin F. A new method of generating fuzzy implications based on e-threshold[J]. Journal of Yunnan University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2024, 46(3): 411-421(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  7. Yue J J. Properties of Generalized Formula -Generated Implications and Their Applications[D].Chengdu: Sichuan Normal University, 2023(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu E H, Zhao B. Formula -implications and their properties[J]. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, 2019, 33(4): 11-20(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  9. Ma Q, Zhou H J. Formula -implications and its characterization[J]. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, 2017, 31(5): 1-12(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  10. Yu J H. Characterization of Formula -Implications and Formula -Implications[D]. Xi'an: Shaanxi Normal University, 2018(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu Z Q. New Formula -implication generated by Formula -partial order[J]. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2024, 43(8): 425. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dimuro G P, Bedregal B, Bustince H, et al. Formula -operations and Formula -implications functions constructed from tuples Formula and the generation of fuzzy subsethood and entropy measures[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2017, 82: 170-192. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dimuro G P, Bedregal B, Santiago R H N. On Formula -implications derived from grouping functions[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 279: 1-17. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang Y H, Wang X X, Gao J X, et al. The properties of Formula -coimplication and its characterization[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2024, 39(10): 47-51, 57(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  15. Ti L B, Zhou H J. On Formula -coimplications derived from overlap functions and fuzzy negations[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 34(6): 3993-4007. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mangenakis P G, Papadopoulos B. Innovative methods of constructing strict and strong fuzzy negations, fuzzy implications and new classes of copulas[J]. Mathematics, 2024, 12(14): 2254. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhou H J, Liu X. Characterizations of Formula -implications generated by 2-uninorms and fuzzy negations from the point of view of material implication[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2020, 378: 79-102. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mas M, Monserrat M, Torrens J. A characterization of Formula -, Formula -, Formula -and Formula -implications derived from uninorms satisfying the law of importation[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2010, 161(10): 1369-1387. [Google Scholar]
  19. Massanet S, Torrens J. On the characterization of Yager's implications[J]. Information Sciences, 2012, 201: 1-18. [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu H W. A new class of fuzzy implications derived from generalized Formula -generators[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2013, 224: 63-92. [Google Scholar]
  21. Xie A F, Liu H W. A generalization of Yager's Formula -generated implications[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2013, 54(1): 35-46. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yager R R. On some new classes of implication operators and their role in approximate reasoning[J]. Information Sciences, 2004, 167(1-4): 193-216. [Google Scholar]
  23. Balasubramaniam J. Yager's new class of implications Formula and some classical tautologies[J]. Information Sciences, 2007, 177(3): 930-946. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhou H J. Characterizations of fuzzy implications generated by continuous multiplicative generators of T-norms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2021, 29(10): 2988-3002. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhou H J. Characterizations and applications of fuzzy implications generated by a pair of generators of T-norms and the usual addition of real numbers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2022, 30(6): 1952-1966. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhao Y F, Li K. New results on ordinal sum implications based on ordinal sum of overlap functions[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2022, 441: 83-109. [Google Scholar]
  27. Drygaś P, Król A. Generating fuzzy implications by ordinal sums[J]. Tatra Mountains Mathematical Publications, 2016, 66(1): 39-50. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhao B, Cheng Y F. Natural construction method of ordinal sum implication and its distributivity[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2022, 151: 360-388. [Google Scholar]
  29. Su Y, Xie A F, Liu H W. On ordinal sum implications[J]. Information Sciences, 2015, 293: 251-262. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhou H J. Two general construction ways toward unified framework of ordinal sums of fuzzy implications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2021, 29(4): 846-860. [Google Scholar]
  31. Cheng Y F, Zhao B, Lu J. On vertical ordinal sums of fuzzy implications[J]. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2025, 44(4): 208. [Google Scholar]
  32. Geng J, Chen Z W, Wang R N. Ordinal sums of triangular norms on a bounded trellis[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2025, 516: 109440. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lu J, Zhao B. Constructing ordinal sums of right and left semi-overlap functions on complete lattices[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2025, 514: 109398. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mesiarová-Zemánková A. Non-commutative ordinal sum construction[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2025, 507: 109308. [Google Scholar]
  35. Klement E P, Mesiar R, Pap E. Triangular Norms[M]. Dordreclot: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2000. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.