Issue |
Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci.
Volume 29, Number 5, October 2024
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 412 - 418 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/wujns/2024295412 | |
Published online | 20 November 2024 |
Mathematics
CLC number: O157.5
E-Total Coloring of Complete Bipartite Graphs K5,n (5≤n≤7 113) Which Are Vertex-Distinguished by Multiple Sets
完全二部图K5,n (5≤n≤7 113) 的点被多重集可区别的E-全染色
College of Mathematics and Statistics, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
† Corresponding author. E-mail: chenxe@nwnu.edu.cn
Received:
22
November
2023
In this study, using the method of contradiction and the pre-assignment of chromatic sets, we discuss the E-total coloring of complete bipartite graphs K5,n (5≤n≤7 113) which are vertex-distinguished by multiple sets. The vertex-distinguishing E-total chromatic numbers of this kind of graph are determined.
摘要
本文利用反证法和色集合事先分配法,探讨了完全二部图K5,n (5≤n≤7 113) 的点被多重集可区别的E-全染色,确定了这类图的点被多重集可区别的E-全色数。
Key words: complete bipartite graph / E-total coloring / E-total chromatic number / multiple sets / chromatic sets
关键字 : 完全二部图 / E-全染色 / E-全色数 / 多重集 / 色集合
Cite this article: GUO Yaqin, CHEN Xiang'en. E-Total Coloring of Complete Bipartite Graphs K5,n (5≤n≤7 113) Which Are Vertex-Distinguished by Multiple Sets[J]. Wuhan Univ J of Nat Sci, 2024, 29(5): 412-418.
Biography: GUO Yaqin, female, Master candidate, research direction: graph theory and its application. E-mail: guoyaqin20220901@163.com
Fundation item: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11761064)
© Wuhan University 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
0 Introduction
Many conclusions about the vertex-distinguishing proper edge coloring [1-3] and vertex-distinguishing general edge coloring [4-7] of graphs have been made in simple undirected graphs. The vertex-distinguishing total coloring of graphs was proposed by Zhang et al[8] in 2008. In 2011, Chen et al[9] introduced vertex-distinguishing E-total colorings of graphs. Liu et al[10] studied general vertex-distinguishing total coloring of graphs. In 2019, Chen et al[11] gave a survey on not necessarily proper coloring under which certain pairs of vertices are distinguished by non-multiple color sets. Cao et al[12] discussed the E-total coloring of wheels and fans, which were vertex-distinguished by multiple sets. Wang et al[13] discussed the I-total coloring and VI-total coloring of mC4 vertex-distinguished by multiple sets. In this paper, we study E-total coloring of complete bipartite graphs K5,n (5≤n≤7 113) which are vertex-distinguished by multiple sets and determine E-total chromatic numbers of K5,n (5≤n≤7 113) vertex-distinguished by multiple sets.
1 Preliminaries
An E-total coloring of a graph G is an assignment of several colors to the vertices and edges of the graph G, such that any adjacent vertices are assigned different colors, and each edge and its incident vertices are assigned different colors.
Let f be an E-total coloring of a graph G and x be any vertex of G. The (multiple) set of the colors of x and the edges incident with x under f is called the (multiple) chromatic set of x under f, denoted by C̃f(x) or C̃(x).
Let f be an E-total coloring of a graph G, and for any u, v∈V(G), once u≠v, there exists C̃(u)≠C̃(v), then f is said to be vertex-distinguishable by multiple sets.
A k-E-total coloring of a graph G is an E-total coloring of G using k available colors.
Let =min{k|there exists k-E-total coloring of G which is vertex-distinguished by multiple sets} and we call the E-total chromatic number of G which are vertex-distinguished by multiple sets.
In this study, we use Km,n to represent complete bipartite graphs, where
V(Km,n)={u1,u2,…,um,v1,v2,…,vn}=X∪Y; X={u1,u2,…,um}; Y={ v1,v2,…,vn}; E(Km,n)={uivj│i=1,2,…,m; j=1,2,…,n}.
The mapping h: V ∪ E→{1,2,…,k} is defined. Usually, when coloring, the k colors used are represented by {1,2,…,k}.
Lemma 1[14] The number of repeated combinations of r elements taken from n different elements is .
The repeated combination of r elements from n different elements is called r-combination. r-combination is also a multiple subset containing r elements of the set of n different elements; therefore, an r-combination is also called an r-multiple subset or an r-subset.
2 Main Results and Their Proofs
Theorem 1 If , then .
Proof Firstly, we will prove that there is no 3-E-total coloring of K5,n, which are vertex-distinguished by multiple sets.Suppose that K5,n has an E-total coloring h in which there are 3 available colors, and the vertices are distinguished by multiple sets. The color set of the vertex in Y under h is a 6-subset of {1,2,3} and "at least one color appears only once in this 6-subset". Such 6-subsets may be {1,2,3,3,3,3}, {1,3,2,2,2,2}, {2,3,1,1,1,1}, {1,2,2,3,3,3},{1,3,3,2,2,2}, {2,3,3,1,1,1}, {2,1,1,3,3,3}, {3,2,2,1,1,1}, {3,1,1,2,2,2}, {1,2,2,2,2,2}, {1,3,3,3,3,3},{2,1,1,1,1,1}, {2,3,3,3,3,3}, {3,1,1,1,1,1}, {3,2,2,2,2,2}, the following 5 cases are discussed.
Case 1: u1, u2, u3, u4, and u5 are assigned the same color under h.
Without loss of generality, we assume that h(u1)=h(u2)=h(u3)=h(u4)=h(u5)=1. At this time, all edges of K5,n and all vertices in Y cannot be colored 1. Therefore, the 6-subset of {1,2,3} of the color set of each vertex in Y under h, and "at least one color appears only once in this 6-subset". Such 6-subsets are only {2,3,3,3,3,3}, {3,2,2,2,2,2}. Due to 5≤n≤22, these two 6-subsets cannot distinguish the n vertices in Y, which is a contradiction.
Case 2: u1, u2, u3, u4, and u5 are assigned two different colors under h, and four vertices in X have the same color.
Without loss of generality, we assume that h(u1)=h(u2)=h(u3)=h(u4)=1, h(u5)=2. At this time, all vertices in Y cannot be colored with colors 1 and 2. Therefore, the 6-subset of {1,2,3} of the color set of each vertex in Y under h, and "at least one color appears only once in this 6-subset". Such a 6-subset is only {3,1,2,2,2,2}. Due to 5≤n≤22, this 6-subset cannot distinguish n vertices in Y, which is a contradiction.
Case 3: u1, u2, u3, u4, and u5 are assigned two different colors under h, and three vertices in X have the same color, which is different from the colors of the other two vertices.
Without loss of generality, we assume that h(u1)=h(u2)=h(u3)=1, h(u4)=h(u5)=2. At this time, all vertices in Y cannot be colored with colors 1 and 2. Therefore, the 6-subset of {1,2,3} of the color set of each vertex in Y under h, and "at least one color appears only once in this 6-subset". Such a 6-subset is only {3,1,1,2,2,2}. Due to 5≤n≤22, this 6-subset cannot distinguish n vertices in Y, which is a contradiction.
Case 4: u1, u2, u3, u4, and u5 are assigned three different colors under h, and the colors of the three vertices in X are the same.
Without loss of generality, we assume that h(u1)=h(u2)=h(u3)=1, h(u4)=2, h(u5)=3. At this time, all vertices in Y cannot be colored with colors 1, 2 and 3. Then, the 6-subset of {1,2,3} of the color set of each vertex in Y under h, and "at least one color appears only once in this 6-subset". Since a 6-subset does not exist, therefore, such a 6-subset cannot distinguish n vertices in Y, which is a contradiction.
Case 5: u1, u2, u3, u4 and u5 are assigned three different colors under h, and there are no three vertices in X with the same color.
Without loss of generality, we assume that h(u1)=h(u2)=1, h(u3)=h(u4)=2, h(u5)=3. At this time, the three colors cannot distinguish the vertices in K5,n, which is a contradiction.
Secondly, we will give, for each n , there exists a 4-E-total coloring of K5,n which is vertex-distinguished by multiple sets. It is advisable to color the vertices u1, u2, u3, u4 and u5 in X with colors 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, respectively. The following coloring scheme is given using a matrix of 6 rows and 23 columns.
The first-row elements (color) of the matrix except 0 are assigned to the vertices v1, v2, …, v22 in Y. The first column elements (color) of the matrix except 0 are assigned to the vertices u1, u2, u3, u4, and u5 in X. The elements (color) at the intersection of the i+1 row and the j+1 column are assigned to the edges uivj, i=1, 2, 3, 4, 5; j=1, 2, …, 22, then the second row, the third row, the fourth row, the fifth row, and the sixth row are exactly the color sets corresponding to the vertices u1, u2, u3, u4 and u5 in X. The second column, the third column, …, and the 23rd column are exactly the color sets corresponding to the vertices v1, v2, …, v22 in Y.
It can be obtained from the matrix, when n=5, the color sets of vertices in K5,5 under f are 6-subsets. The 6-subsets of vertices in X under f are {1,2,2,2,2,2}, {1,2,2,4,3,2}, {1,4,3,4,3,4}, {2,4,3,1,1,1}, {2,1,1,1,1,1}. The 6-subsets of vertices in Y under f are {3,2,2,4,4,1}, {4,2,2,3,3,1}, {3,2,4,4,1,1}, {4,2,3,3,1,1}, {3,2,2,4,1,1}. All 6-subsets in X are different from all 6-subsets in Y under f, so . When 6≤n≤22, the color sets of vertices in X under f are (n+1)-subsets. The color sets corresponding to the vertices in Y are all 6-subsets. Therefore, the color sets corresponding to the vertices in X under f are different from those corresponding to the vertices in Y under f. According to the specific coloring scheme given by the matrix, the vertices and all edges in K5,n are colored. It can be obtained that the corresponding color sets of vertices in X under f are different from each other. The corresponding color sets of vertices in Y under f are different from each other, so .
Proof Firstly, we will prove that there is no (k–1)-E-total coloring of K5,n which are vertex-distinguished by multiple sets.Suppose that K5,n has an E-total coloring h in which there are k–1 available colors, and the vertices are distinguished by multiple sets; the following 7 cases are discussed.
Case 1: u1, u2, u3, u4 and u5 are assigned the same color under h.
Without loss of generality, we assume that h(u1)=h(u2)=h(u3)=h(u4)=h(u5)=1. At this time, all edges of K5,n and all vertices in Y cannot be colored 1. The color set of each vertex in Y under h is a 6-subset of {2,3,…,k–1}, and "at least one color appears only once in this 6-subset". There are
such 6-subsets. When ,
then
Therefore, all such 6-subsets cannot distinguish n vertices in X in Y, which is a contradiction.
Case 2: u1, u2, u3, u4 and u5 are assigned two different colors under h, and four vertices have the same color.
Without loss of generality, we assume that h(u1)= h(u2)= h(u3)= h(u4)=1, h(u5)=2. At this time, for each s, t, r, p∈{3,4,…,k–1}, {s,t,r,p,1,1}, {s,t,r,2,1,1}, {s,t,r,r,1,1}, {s,t,2,2,1,1}, {s,2,t,t,1,1}, {1,2,s,s,t,t}, {s,t,r,1,1,1}, {s,t,2,1,1,1}, {1,2,s,s,s,s}, {s,t,1,1,1,1}, {s,2,1,1,1,1}, {s,t,t,1,1,1}, {s,2,2,1,1,1}, {1,2,2,s,s,s}, {2,1,1,s,s,s}, {s,1,1,t,t,t}, {s,1,1,2,2,2}, {1,s,s,2,2,2}, {1,s,s,t,t,t}, {2,s,s,1,1,1}, {2,s,s,t,t,t}, {s,1,1,1,1,1}, {s,2,2,2,2,2}, {1,s,s,s,s,s}, {2,s,s,s,s,s}, {1,2,2,2,2,2}, {2,1,1,1,1,1} cannot be the color sets of vertices in Y, and the number of such color sets is . Then there are color sets, which can become the color sets of the vertices in Y. When ,
thenTherefore, all such 6-subsets cannot distinguish n vertices in Y, which is a contradiction.
Case 3: u1, u2, u3, u4, and u5 are assigned two different colors under h, and three vertices in X have the same color, which is different from the colors of the other two vertices in X .
Without loss of generality, we assume that h(u1)= h(u2)= h(u3)=1, h(u4)=h(u5)=2. At this time, for each s, t, r ∈{3,4,…,k–1}, {1,2,s,s,t,t}, {s,t,r,1,1,1}, {s,t,2,1,1,1}, {1,2,s,s,s,s}, {s,1,2,2,2,2}, {s,t,2,2,2,2}, {s,2,1,1,1,1}, {s,t,1,1,1,1}, {1,s,s,t,t,t}, {2,s,s,t,t,t}, {1,2,2,s,s,s}, {2,1,1,s,s,s}, {1,s,s,2,2,2}, {2,s,s,1,1,1}, {s,t,t,1,1,1}, {s,2,2,1,1,1}, {1,2,2,2,2,2}, {1,s,s,s,s,s}, {2,1,1,1,1,1}, {2,s,s,s,s,s}, {s,1,1,1,1,1}, {s,2,2,2,2,2} cannot be the color sets of vertices in Y, and the number of such color sets is color sets, which can become the color sets of the vertices of Y. When , Hence, all such 6-subsets cannot distinguish the n vertices in Y, which results in a contradiction.
Case 4: u1, u2, u3, u4, and u5 are assigned three different colors under h, and the colors of the three vertices in X are the same.
Without loss of generality, we assume that h(u1)= h(u2)= h(u3)=1, h(u4)=2, h(u5)=3. At this time, for each s, t ∈{4,5,…,k–1}, i, j, x ∈{1,2,3}, {i,j,s,s,t,t}, {i,j,x,x,s,s}, {s,3,3,1,1,1}, {s,2,2,1,1,1}, {s,t,t,1,1,1}, {s,t,r,1,1,1}, {s,t,2,1,1,1}, {s,t,3,1,1,1}, {s,2,3,1,1,1}, {i,j,x,s,s,s}, {i,j,s,s,s,s}, {i,j,x,x,x,x}, {s,t,1,1,1,1}, {s,2,1,1,1,1}, {s,3,1,1,1,1}, {i,s,s,t,t,t}, {i,j,j,x,x,x}, {i,j,j,s,s,s}, {i,s,s,j,j,j}, {i,j,j,j,j,j}, {i,s,s,s,s,s}, {s,i,i,i,i,i} cannot be the color sets of vertices in Y, and the number of such color sets is. Then there arecolor sets, which can become the color sets of the vertices of Y. When ,
ThenTherefore, all such 6-subsets cannot distinguish n vertices in Y, which is a contradiction.
Case 5: u1, u2, u3, u4, and u5 are assigned three different colors under h, and there are no three vertices in X with the same color.
Without loss of generality, we assume that h(u1)= h(u2)=1, h(u3)=h(u4)=2, h(u5)=3. At this time, for each s, t ∈{4,5,…,k–1}, i, j, x ∈{1,2,3}, {i,j,s,s,t,t}, {i,j,x,x,s,s}, {i,j,x,s,s,s}, {i,j,s,s,s,s}, {i,j,x,x,x,x}, {s,t,1,1,1,1}, {s,t,2,2,2,2}, {s,2,1,1,1,1}, {s,1,2,2,2,2}, {s,3,1,1,1,1}, {s,3,2,2,2,2}, {i,j,j,x,x,x}, {i,s,s,t,t,t}, {i,j,j,s,s,s}, {i,s,s,j,j,j}, {i,j,j,j,j,j}, {i,s,s,s,s,s}, {s,i,i,i,i,i} cannot be the color sets of vertices in Y, and the number of such color sets is . Then there are color sets, which can become the color sets of the vertices of Y. When ,
Then
Therefore, all such 6-subsets cannot distinguish n vertices in Y, which is a contradiction.
Case 6: u1, u2, u3, u4 and u5 are assigned four different colors under h.
Without loss of generality, we assume that h(u1)= h(u2)=1, h(u3)=2,h(u4)=3, h(u5)=4. At this time, for each s, t ∈{5,6,…,k–1}, i, j, x, y ∈{1,2,3,4}, {i,j,x,y,s,s}, {i,j,s,s,t,t}, {i,j,x,x,y,y}, {i,j,x,x,s,s}, {i,j,x,s,s,s}, {i,j,x,y,y,y}, {i,j,x,x,x,x}, {i,j,s,s,s,s}, {s,t,1,1,1,1}, {s,2,1,1,1,1}, {s,3,1,1,1,1}, {s,4,1,1,1,1}, {i,j,j,x,x,x}, {i,j,j,s,s,s}, {i,s,s,j,j,j}, {i,s,s,t,t,t}, {i,j,j,j,j,j}, {i,s,s,s,s,s}, {s,i,i,i,i,i} cannot be the color sets of vertices in Y, and the number of such color sets is . Then there are
color sets, which can become the color sets of the vertices of Y. When ,
Then
Therefore, all such 6-subsets cannot distinguish n vertices in Y, which is a contradiction.
Case 7: u1, u2, u3, u4 and u5 are assigned five different colors under h.
Without loss of generality, we assume that h(u1)=1, h(u2)=2, h(u3)=3, h(u4)=4, h(u5)=5. At this time, for each s, t ∈{6,7,…,k–1}, i, j, x, y, w ∈{1,2,3,4,5}, {i,j,x,y,s,s}, {i,j,x,y,w,w}, {i,j,s,s,t,t}, {i,j,x,x,s,s}, {i,j,x,x,y,y}, {i,j,x,s,s,s}, {i,j,x,y,y,y}, {i,j,s,s,s,s}, {i,j,x,x,x,x}, {i,s,s,t,t,t}, {i,j,j,x,x,x}, {i,j,j,s,s,s}, {i,s,s,j,j,j}, {i,j,j,j,j,j}, {i,s,s,s,s,s}, {s,i,i,i,i,i} cannot be the color sets of vertices in Y, and the number of such color sets is . Then there are color sets, which can become the color sets of the vertices of Y. When ,
Then
Therefore, all such 6-subsets cannot distinguish n vertices in Y, which is a contradiction.
Secondly, we will demonstrate that there exists a k-E-total coloring of K5,n which is vertex-distinguished by multiple sets. It is advisable to color the vertices u1, u2, u3, u4 and u5 in X with colors 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, respectively. {a,b,c,d,e,f}, {a,b,c,d,e,e}, {a,b,c,c,d,d}, {a,b,c,d,d,d}, {a,b,c,c,c,c}, {a,b,b,c,c,c}, {a,b,b,b,b,b} can be the color sets of vertices in Y under f. There are such 6-subsets. We suggest that the vertices v1, v2, v3, v4 and v5 in Y correspond to five 6-subsets in turn: {5,2,3,4,4,1}, {5,2,2,3,1,1}, {5,2,2,2,1,1}, {5,2,2,2,3,3}, {5,3,3,3,1,1}, and let the remaining n–5 vertices vj in Y correspond to any n–5 subsets in the remaining such 6-subsets, j=6,7,…,n, the specific coloring scheme is as follows. When the 6-subset corresponding to vj is in the form of {s,t,r,p,q,m}, {s,2,t,r,p,1}, {s,t,r,p,q,1}, {s,2,t,r,p,q}, {s,t,r,p,q,q}, {s,2,2,t,r,p}, {s,t,r,p,1,1}, {s,2,2,t,r,1}, {s,2,t,r,1,1}, {s,2,t,r,r,1}, {s,1,t,r,p,p}, {s,t,r,p,p,2}, {s,t,r,r,p,p}, {s,2,2,t,1,1}, {s,t,r,r,1,1}, {s,2,2,t,r,r}, {s,t,t,r,r,1}, {s,2,t,t,r,r}, {s,2,2,t,t,1}, {s,2,t,t,1,1}, {s,t,r,p,p,p}, {s,2,2,2,t,r}, {s,2,2,2,t,1}, {s,t,r,r,r,1}, {s,2,t,t,t,1}, {s,2,t,r,r,r}, {s,t,r,r,r,r}, {s,t,t,t,t,1}, {s,2,t,t,t,t}, {s,t,t,r,r,r}, {s,2,2,2,1,1}, {s,t,t,t,1,1}, {s,2,2,2,t,t}, {s,2,2,t,t,t} or {s,t,t,t,t,t}, where different colors s, t, r, p, q, m ∈ {3,4,…,k}, vj and u1vj, u2vj, u3vj, u4vj, u5vjare colored with the first color, the second color, the third color, the fourth color, fifth color and the sixth color of the color set, respectively.
At this time, the color set of each vertex in Y is exactly the color set corresponding to this vertex in advance. As the sets corresponding to different vertices in Y are different; therefore, no two distinct vertices in Y has the same color set.
The number of elements in the color sets of vertices in X is different from that in the color sets of vertices in Y, so the sets of the colors of vertices in X are different from that in Y.
The following proves that C̃(u1), C̃(u2), C̃(u3), C̃(u4), C̃(u5) are not equal to each other. It can be seen from the coloring scheme that both C̃(u4) and C̃(u5) contain only one element 2 (because the vertices u4 and u5 in X are colored with color 2, the color of the edges associated with these two vertices cannot be 2 ). When 5≤ k ≤11, C̃(u1), C̃(u2) and C̃(u3) contain more than one element 2. Therefore C̃(u1)≠C̃(u4), C̃(u1)≠C̃(u5), C̃(u2)≠C̃(u4), C̃(u2)≠C̃(u5), C̃(u3)≠C̃(u4), C̃(u3)≠C̃(u5). Let C̃(ui)={f(ui), f(uiv1), …, f(uivn)}, i=1, 2, 3, 4, 5, easy to know f(u1v1)=2, f(u2v1)=3, f(u3v1)=4, f(u4v1)=4, f(u5v1)=1.
If C̃(u1), C̃(u2), C̃(u3) are all equal, we can exchange colors f(u1v1) and f(u2v1). At this time, the color sets corresponding to the vertices v1 and other vertices vj in Y are unchanged, j = 2,3,…,n. And C̃(u1) has one more color f(u2v1), and one less color f(u1v1), there is a color f(u1v1) in C̃(u2), and a color f(u2v1) is missing, the color set corresponding to C̃(u3) is unchanged. Therefore C̃(u1)≠C̃(u2)≠C̃(u3).
If C̃(u1), C̃(u2), C̃(u3) have two values. Without loss of generality, we assume that C̃(u1)= C̃(u2)≠C̃(u3), we can exchange colors f(u1v1) and f(u2v1). At this time, the color sets corresponding to vertex v1 and other vertices vj in Y are unchanged. And C̃(u1) contains one more a color f(u2v1), less a color f(u1v1), C̃(u2) has one more color f(u1v1) and one less color f(u2v1). The color set corresponding to C̃(u3) is unchanged. Then if C̃(u1)=C̃(u3)≠C̃(u2), then continue to exchange the second element in C̃(u1) and C̃(u3), namely the exchange of colors f(u2v1) and f(u3v1), so C̃(u1)≠C̃(u2)≠C̃(u3).
If C̃(u4)=C̃(u5), we can exchange colors f(u4v1) and f(u5v1). At this time, the color set corresponding to the vertex v1 and other vertices vj in Y is unchanged, j=2,3,…,n. And C̃(u4) has one more color f(u5v1) and one less color f(u4v1), C̃(u5) has one more color f(u4v1) and one less color f(u5v1). Therefore, C̃(u4)≠C̃(u5).
From the above, C̃(u1), C̃(u2), C̃(u3), C̃(u4), C̃(u5) are pairwise distinct.
In conclusion, we obtain a k-E-total coloring of K5,n which are vertex-distinguished by multiple sets.
3 Summary and Prospection
In this study, the E-total chromatic numbers of complete bipartite graphs K5,n (5≤n≤7 113) have been obtained, which are vertex-distinguished by multiple sets, by using the method of pre-assignment of color sets and the method of constructing specific coloring. The methodologies employed in this paper can encourage people to study further the E-total colorings of complete bipartite graphs Km,n (6≤m≤n) vertex-distinguished by multiple sets.
References
- Burris A C. Vertex-Distinguishing Edge-Colorings[D]. Memphis: Memphis State University, 1993: 1-15. [Google Scholar]
- Burris A C, Schelp R H. Vertex-distinguishing proper edge-colorings[J]. Journal of Graph Theory, 1997, 26(2): 73-82. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Balister P N, Riordan O M, Schelp R H. Vertex-distinguishing edge colorings of graphs[J]. Journal of Graph Theory, 2003, 42(2): 95-109. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Horňák M, Soták R. The fifth jump of the point-distinguishing chromatic index of Kn,n[J]. Ars Combinatoria, 1996, 42: 233-242. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Horňák M, Soták R. Localization of jumps of the point-distinguishing chromatic index of Kn,n[J]. Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory, 1997, 17(2): 243-251. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Horňák M, Salvi N Z. On the point-distinguishing chromatic index of complete bipartite graphs[J]. Ars Combinatoria, 2006, 80: 75-85. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Salvi N Z. On the value of the point-distinguishing chromatic index of Kn,n[J]. Ars Combinatoria, 1990, 29B: 235-244. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Z F, Qiu P X, Xu B G, et al. Vertex-distinguishing total coloring of graphs[J]. Ars Combinatoria, 2008, 87: 33-45. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X E, Zu Y, Xu J, et al. Vertex-distinguishing E-total colorings of graphs[J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2011, 36(8): 1485-1500. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Liu C J, Zhu E Q. General vertex-distinguishing total coloring of graphs[J]. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014, 2014: 849748. [Google Scholar]
- Chen X E. A survey on not necessarily proper colorings under which certain pairs of vertices are distinguished by nonmultiple color sets[J]. Journal of Guangzhou University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 18(4): 50-59(Ch). [Google Scholar]
- Cao J, Chen X E. E-total coloring of wheels and fans which are vertex-distinguished by multiple sets[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Natural Science), 2023, 59(2):38-46(Ch). [Google Scholar]
- Wang N N, Chen X E. I-total coloring and VI-total coloring of mC4 vertex-distinguished by multiple sets[J]. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 2023, 28(3): 201-206. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Shao J Y. Combinatorial Mathematics[M]. Shanghai: Tongji University Press, 1990(Ch). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.