Open Access

Table 1

Performance comparison of different models on the UT-HAR and NTU-Fi_HAR datasets (unit:%)

Method UT-HAR NTU-Fi_HAR
Acc. F1 Acc. F1
Modified LeNet-5 94.20 94.17 97.73 97.72
ResNet-18 98.60 98.59 87.50 87.30
LSTM 87.00 86.77 95.83 95.79
ABLSTM 94.40 94.39 96.59 96.54
GAF-CNN 68.00 66.83 99.62 99.62
CNN-ECBAM 99 . 20 * Mathematical equation 99 . 20 * Mathematical equation 100 * * Mathematical equation 100 * * Mathematical equation

Note:   Statistical significance vs. strongest baseline is indicated by * (p<0.05), ** (p<0.01) using paired t-test over 5 independent runs.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.