EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 26 / No 6 (December 2021) Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci., 26 6 (2021) 527-534 References
Open Access
Issue
Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci.
Volume 26, Number 6, December 2021
Page(s) 527 - 534
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/wujns/2021266527
Published online 17 December 2021
  1. Wackernagel M, Rees W. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth [M]. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  2. Simsar A. Young children’s ecological footprint awareness and environmental attitudes in Turkey [J]. Child Indicators Research, 2021, 14(4): 1387-1413. [Google Scholar]
  3. Koyuncu T, Beser M K, Alola A A. Environmental sustainability statement of economic regimes with energy intensity and urbanization in Turkey: A threshold regression approach [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28(31): 42533-42546. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Echegaray F. What POST-COVID-19 lifestyles may look like? Identifying scenarios and their implications for sustainability [J]. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2021, 27: 567-574. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Butnariu A, Avasilcai S. Research on the possibility to apply ecological footprint as environmental performance indicator for the textile industry [J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 124: 344-350. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Monfreda C, Wackernagel M, Deumling D. Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity assessments [J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21: 231-246. [Google Scholar]
  7. Herva M, Álvarez A, Roca E. Combined application of energy and material flow analysis and ecological footprint for the environmental evaluation of a tailoring factory [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2012, 237-238: 231-239. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bicknell K B, Ball R J, Cullen R, et al. New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy [J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 27(2): 149-160. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cerutti A K, Bagliani M, Beccaro G L, et al. Application of ecological footprint analysis on nectarine production: Methodological issues and results from a case study in Italy [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010, 18: 771-776. [Google Scholar]
  10. Frey S D, Harrison D J, Billett E H. Ecological footprint analysis applied to mobile phones [J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2006, 10(1-2): 199-216. [Google Scholar]
  11. Herva M, Franco A, Ferreiro S, et al. An approach for the application of the ecological footprint as environmental indicator in the textile sector [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 156(1): 478-487. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Herva M, Álvarez A, Roca E. Sustainable and safe design of footwear integrating ecological footprint and risk criteria [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 192: 1876-1881. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Herva M, García-Diéguez C, Franco-Uría A, et al. New insights on ecological footprinting as environmental indicator for production processes [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 16: 84-90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Herva M, Franco-Uría A, Carrasco E F, et al. Application of fuzzy logic for the integration of environmental criteria in eco-design [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39: 4427-4431. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lenzen M, Lundie S, Bransgrove G, et al. Assessing the ecological footprint of a large metropolitan water supplier: Lessons for water management and planning towards sustainability [J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2003, 46(1): 113-141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Limnios E A M, Ghadouani A, Schilizzi S G M, et al. Giving the consumer the choice: A methodology for product ecological footprint calculation [J]. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68: 2525-2534. [Google Scholar]
  17. Niccolucci V, Galli A, Kitzes J, et al. Ecological footprint analysis applied to the production of two Italian wines [J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 2008, 128(3): 162-166. [Google Scholar]
  18. Saravia-Cortez A M, Herva M, García-Diéguez C, et al. Assessing environmental sustainability of particleboard production process by ecological footprint [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 52: 301-308. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kitzes J, Wackernagel M. Answers to common questions in ecological footprint accounting [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2009, 9(4): 812-817. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. World Wide Fund for Nature. Living Planet Report 2010 [EB/OL]. [2021-06-16] http://assets.panda.org/downloads/lpr2010.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  21. Solís-Guzmán J, Marrero M, Ramírez-de-Arellano A. Methodology for determining the ecological footprint of the construction of residential buildings in Andalusia (Spain) [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013, 25: 239-249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lan S F, Qin P, Lu S F. Ecological Economic System Emergy Analysis [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2002(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  23. Department of Energy Statistics, National Bureau of Statistics. China Energy Statistical Yearbook [M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 1989(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  24. Department of Energy Statistics, National Bureau of Statistics. China Energy Statistical Yearbook [M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 1996(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  25. Department of Energy Statistics, National Bureau of Statistics. China Energy Statistical Yearbook [M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2014(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  26. National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook [M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 1984(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  27. National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook [M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2001(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  28. National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook [M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2004(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  29. National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook [M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2015(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhu Z M. Sawmilling and Lumber Inspection Technology [M]. Beijing: China Forestry Press, 2007: 116-120. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yin Z H, Tian M H. Analysis of gains or losses of chinese timber imports in great quantities [J]. Forestry Economics, 2006(9): 47-50(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  32. González-Vallejo P, Marrero M, Solís-Guzmán J. The ecological footprint of dwelling construction in Spain [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 52: 75-84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Xia H P. Measurement and Analysis of the Ecological Footprint in the Chinese International Trade [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2012(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  34. Xie G D, Cao S Y, Yang Q S, et al. Living Planet Report China 2015 [EB/OL]. [2021-05-14]. http://www.docin.com/p-1535085428.html. [Google Scholar]
  35. Li J Q, Tian K, Chen S Z. Change of Beijing’s ecological footprint and its countermeasure in the New Century [J]. Forestry Economics, 2013 (4): 102-109(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  36. Gaussin M, Hu G, Abolghasem S, et al. Assessing the environmental footprint of manufactured products: A survey of current literature [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 146(2): 515-523. [Google Scholar]
  37. Westkämper E, Alting L, Arndt G. Life cycle management and assessment: Approaches and visions towards sustainable manufacturing [J]. CIRP Annals, 2000, 49(2): 501-526. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Joshi K, Venkatachalam A, Jawahir I S. A new methodology for transforming 3R concept into 6R concept for improved product sustainability [C]// IV Global Conference on Sustainable Product Development and Life Cycle Engineering. 2006: 3-6. [Google Scholar]
  39. Cerutti A K, Beccaro G L, Bagliani M, et al. Multifunctional ecological footprint analysis for assessing eco-efficiency: A case study of fruit production systems in Northern Italy [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 40: 108-117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.