Open Access
Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci.
Volume 27, Number 1, March 2022
Page(s) 11 - 16
Published online 16 March 2022
  1. Sun Q Y, Teng F, Zhang H G. Energy Internet and its key control issues [J]. Journal of Automation, 2017, 43(2): 176-194. [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu Y B, Wang Q, Zeng Q, et al. Key technologies and prospects for energy consumption control in 5G networks in the context of energy internet [J]. Power System Automation, 2021, 45(12): 174-183. [Google Scholar]
  3. Meng H, Thing V L L, Cheng Y, et al. A survey of Android exploits in the wild [J]. Computers & Security, 2018, 76: 71-91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Li X C. Design and Implementation of a Management System for IoT Connected Light Directory Protocols and Services [D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2015(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhao B, Fei Y K, Xiang S, et al. Research and implementation of secure boot mechanism for embedded systems [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2014, 10: 72-77. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang X, Yang X Y, Zhu R, et al. Trusted access authentication protocol for mobile nodes in the Internet of Things environment [J]. Computer Applications, 2016, 11: 3108-3112. [Google Scholar]
  7. Xu C, Liang R, Cheng Z H, et al. Smart distribution network security situational awareness for energy internet [J]. Power Automation Equipment, 2016, 36(6): 13-18. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gasparis I, Qian Z, Song C, et al. Detecting android root exploits by learning from root providers [C]// Proceedings of the 26th USENIX Conference on Security Symposium. New York: ACM, 2017: 1129-1144. [Google Scholar]
  9. Imtiaz S I, Rehman S U, Javed A R, et al. DeepAMD: Detection and identification of Android malware using high-efficient Deep Artificial Neural Network [J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2021, 115: 844-856. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Korkmaz I, Metin S K, Gurek A, et al. A cloud based and Android supported scalable home automation system [J]. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2015, 43: 112-128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang Y Q, Wang K, Yang H, et al. Survey of Android OS security [J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2014, 51(7): 1385-1396(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  12. Watanabe T, Akiyama M, Kanei F, et al. Understanding the origins of mobile app vulnerabilities: A large-scale measurement study of free and paid apps [C]//2017 IEEE/ACM 14th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR). Piscataway: IEEE, 2017: 14-24. [Google Scholar]
  13. Shen D, Li Z, Su X, et al. TinyVisor: An extensible secure framework on android platforms [J]. Computers & Security, 2018, 72: 145-162. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yan J, Qi Y, Rao Q, et al. LSTM-based hierarchical denoising network for Android malware detection [J]. Security and Communication Networks, 2018, 2018: 1-18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shaheen J A, Asghar M A, Hussain A. Android OS with its architecture and Android application with Dalvik virtual machine review [J]. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 2017, 12(7): 19-30. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Xiang Y, Tian X X, Zhou S, et al. Construction and application of digital creative platform for digital creative industry based on smart city concept [J]. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2020, 87: 106748. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.