EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 29 / No 6 (December 2024) Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci., 29 6 (2024) 600-610 References
Open Access
Issue
Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci.
Volume 29, Number 6, December 2024
Page(s) 600 - 610
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/wujns/2024296600
Published online 07 January 2025
  1. Zhang R H, Li Z G, Liu X D, et al. Immobilization and bioavailability of heavy metals in greenhouse soils amended with rice straw-derived biochar[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2017, 98: 183-188. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu B R, Huang Q, Su Y F, et al. Speciation of nickel and enzyme activities in fluvo-aquic soil under organic amendments treatment[J]. Soil Research, 2018, 56(5): 456-467. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Yang X, Liu J J, McGrouther K, et al. Effect of biochar on the extractability of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn) and enzyme activity in soil[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23(2): 974-984. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Muhammad A, Xu J M, Li Z J, et al. Effects of lead and cadmium nitrate on biomass and substrate utilization pattern of soil microbial communities[J]. Chemosphere, 2005, 60(4): 508-514. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Yang Q Q, Li Z Y, Lu X N, et al. A review of soil heavy metal pollution from industrial and agricultural regions in China: Pollution and risk assessment[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 642: 690-700. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Liang W Y, Wang G H, Peng C, et al. Recent advances of carbon-based nano zero valent iron for heavy metals remediation in soil and water: A critical review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 426: 127993. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu L W, Li W, Song W P, et al. Remediation techniques for heavy metal-contaminated soils: Principles and applicability[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 633: 206-219. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Khalid S, Shahid M, Niazi N K, et al. A comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2017, 182: 247-268. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yang J, Hu R, Zhao C, et al. Challenges and opportunities for improving the environmental quality of cadmium-contaminated soil in China[J]. J Hazard Mater, 2023, 445: 130560. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rehman M Z U, Rizwan M, Khalid H, et al. Farmyard manure alone and combined with immobilizing amendments reduced cadmium accumulation in wheat and rice grains grown in field irrigated with raw effluents[J]. Chemosphere, 2018, 199: 468-476. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Reeves R D, Baker A J M, Jaffré T, et al. A global database for plants that hyperaccumulate metal and metalloid trace elements[J]. The New Phytologist, 2018, 218(2): 407-411. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Azhar U, Ahmad H, Shafqat H, et al. Remediation techniques for elimination of heavy metal pollutants from soil: A review[J]. Environmental Research, 2022, 214(Pt 4): 113918. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Luo Y M, Chen T. Twenty Years of Research and Development on Soil Pollution and Remediation in China[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang T H, Lai Y J, Hseu Z Y. Efficacy of cheap amendments for stabilizing trace elements in contaminated paddy fields[J]. Chemosphere, 2018, 198: 130-138. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pu X Z, Zhang G J, Zhang P P, et al. Effects of straw management, inorganic fertiliser, and manure amendment on soil microbial properties, nutrient availability, and root growth in a drip-irrigated cotton field[J]. Crop and Pasture Science, 2016, 67(12): 1297-1308. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu Z J, Rong Q L, Zhou W, et al. Effects of inorganic and organic amendment on soil chemical properties, enzyme activities, microbial community and soil quality in yellow clayey soil[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(3): e0172767. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bonilla N, Cazorla F M, Martínez-Alonso M, et al. Organic amendments and land management affect bacterial community composition, diversity and biomass in avocado crop soils[J]. Plant and Soil, 2012, 357(1): 215-226. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rajkumar M, Vara Prasad M N, Freitas H, et al. Biotechnological applications of serpentine soil bacteria for phytoremediation of trace metals[J]. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2009, 29(2): 120-130. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pv D D, Suresh G, Rajmohan B. Bioremediation of soil by removing heavy metals using saccharomyces cerevisiae[C]// 2nd International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology. Kuala Lumpur: IACSIT Press, 2011: 502-507. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li Y H, Jia M K, Hua Y, et al. Reduction of soil cadmium bioavailability by using industrial byproduct phosphorus slag[J]. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 2020, 25(3): 229-237. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhao Y J, Liu B, Zhang W G, et al. Effects of plant and influent C: N: P ratio on microbial diversity in pilot-scale constructed wetlands[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2010, 36(4): 441-449. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Saleem M, Iqbal J, Akhter G, et al. Fractionation, bioavailability, contamination and environmental risk of heavy metals in the sediments from a freshwater reservoir, Pakistan[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2018, 184: 199-208. [Google Scholar]
  23. Li Z G, Luo Y M, Teng Y. Research Methods on Soil and Environmental Microbiology[M]. Beijing: Sciences Press, 2008(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  24. Guan S M. Soil Enzymes and Its Methodology[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1986(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  25. Lin R Y, Rong H, Zhou J J, et al. Impact of allelopathic rice seedlings on rhizospheric microbial populations and their functional diversity[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(9): 3644-3654. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shannon C E. A mathematical theory of communication[J]. The Bell System Technical Journal, 1948, 27(3): 379-423. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Keylock C J. Simpson diversity and the Shannon-Wiener index as special cases of a generalized entropy[J]. Oikos, 2005, 109(1): 203-207. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ge Z W, Du H J, Gao Y L, et al. Analysis on metabolic functions of stored rice microbial communities by BIOLOG ECO microplates[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018, 9: 1375. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ministry of Agricultural of the People's Republic of China (MOA). Determination of Chlorophyll Content in Fruits,Vegetables and Derived Products Spectrophotometry Method (NY/T 3082-2017)[S]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zou Q. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry Experiment Guide[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1995(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  31. Khan M A, Ding X D, Khan S, et al. The influence of various organic amendments on the bioavailability and plant uptake of cadmium present in mine-degraded soil[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 636: 810-817. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang B L, Wang C P, Li J, et al. Remediation of alkaline soil with heavy metal contamination using tourmaline as a novel amendment[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2014, 2(3): 1281-1286. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bashir S, Hussain Q, Akmal M, et al. Sugarcane bagasse-derived biochar reduces the cadmium and chromium bioavailability to mash bean and enhances the microbial activity in contaminated soil[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2018, 18(3): 874-886. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sun Y B, Xu Y, Xu Y M, et al. Reliability and stability of immobilization remediation of Cd polluted soils using sepiolite under pot and field trials[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 208(Pt B): 739-746. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Bashir S, Rizwan M S, Salam A, et al. Cadmium immobilization potential of rice straw-derived biochar, zeolite and rock phosphate: Extraction techniques and adsorption mechanism[J]. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2018, 100(5): 727-732. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Khan M A, Khan S, Khan A, et al. Soil contamination with cadmium, consequences and remediation using organic amendments[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 601/602: 1591-1605. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Chen H S, Huang Q Y, Liu L N, et al. Poultry manure compost alleviates the phytotoxicity of soil cadmium: Influence on growth of pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.)[J]. Pedosphere, 2010, 20(1): 63-70. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu L N, Chen H S, Cai P, et al. Immobilization and phytotoxicity of Cd in contaminated soil amended with chicken manure compost[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 163(2/3): 563-567. [Google Scholar]
  39. Han J C, Zhang C G, Cheng J, et al. Effects of biogas residues containing antibiotics on soil enzyme activity and lettuce growth[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(6): 6116-6122. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Gianfreda L, Rao M A, Piotrowska A, et al. Soil enzyme activities as affected by anthropogenic alterations: Intensive agricultural practices and organic pollution[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2005, 341(1/2/3): 265-279. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Meena M D, Joshi P K, Narjary B, et al. Effects of municipal solid waste compost, rice-straw compost and mineral fertilisers on biological and chemical properties of a saline soil and yields in a mustard-pearl millet cropping system[J]. Soil Research, 2016, 54(8): 958-969. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tejada M. Application of different organic wastes in a soil polluted by cadmium: Effects on soil biological properties[J]. Geoderma, 2009, 153(1/2): 254-268. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wu W C, Wu J H, Liu X W, et al. Inorganic phosphorus fertilizer ameliorates maize growth by reducing metal uptake, improving soil enzyme activity and microbial community structure[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2017, 143: 322-329. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Guan G, Tu S X, Li H L, et al. Phosphorus fertilization modes affect crop yield, nutrient uptake, and soil biological properties in the rice-wheat cropping system[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2013, 77(1): 166-172. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ma N N, Li T L, Wu C C, et al. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil enzyme activities and soil physicochemical properties of facility vegetable field[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 21(7): 1766-1771(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  46. Singh R, Nye P H. The effect of soil pH and high urea concentrations on urease activity in soil[J]. Journal of Soil Science, 1984, 35(4): 519-527. [Google Scholar]
  47. Mäder P, Fliessbach A, Dubois D, et al. Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming[J]. Science, 2002, 296(5573): 1694-1697. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Li X, Zhang H H, Yue B B, et al. Effects of mulberry-soybean intercropping on microbial diversity of carbon metabolism in saline-alkali soil[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 23(7): 1825-1831(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  49. Lee J J, Park R D, Kim Y W, et al. Effect of food waste compost on microbial population, soil enzyme activity and lettuce growth[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2004, 93(1): 21-28. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Jin Z, Lei J, Li S, et al. Metabolic characteristics of microbial communities of Aeolian sandy soils induced by saline water drip irrigation in shelter forests[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2015, 66(3): 476-484. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang S S, Zhang H M, Qin R, et al. Cadmium induction of lipid peroxidation and effects on root tip cells and antioxidant enzyme activities in Vicia faba L[J]. Ecotoxicology, 2009, 18(7): 814-823. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.