Open Access
Table 1
Comparison of different detection methods based on CRISPR-Cas system
Method | Target gene | Detection time | Sensitivity | Specificity | Virus | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DETECTR | N, E | 45 min | 10 copies | High | SARS-CoV-2 (NC_045512) | [9] |
opvCRISPR | S | 45 min | 5 copies | High | SARS-CoV-2 (NC_045512) | [10] |
AIOD-CRISPR | N | 40 min | 1.3 copies | High | SARS-CoV-2 (NC_045512) | [25] |
SHERLOCK | ORF1ab, S | 40 min | 100 copies | High | SARS-CoV-2 (NC_045512) | [12] |
mCARMEN | S | < 5 h | 100 copies | High | SARS-CoV-2(NC_045512.2), Omicron, Delta | [26] |
FnCas9-based CRISPR diagnostic | S | < 1 h | Viral load (qRT-PCR Ct < 25) |
Moderate | SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-2 (N501Y, E484K, T716I mutation) | [27] |
CRISPR-Cas13-based transcription amplification | E | < 2 h | 82 copies | High | SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-2 (D614G mutation), MERS,and SARS, H1N1, H7N9,and H9N2 | [28] |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.