EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 28 / No 1 (February 2023) Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci., 28 1 (2023) 68-76 References
Open Access
Issue
Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci.
Volume 28, Number 1, February 2023
Page(s) 68 - 76
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/wujns/2023281068
Published online 17 March 2023
  1. Yao C W, Xu B S, Zhang X C, et al. Interface microstructure and mechanical properties of laser welding copper-steel dissimilar joint[J]. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2009, 47(7/8): 807-814. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Yan F, Qin Y, Tang B K, et al. Effects of beam oscillation on microstructural characteristics and mechanical properties in laser welded steel-copper joints[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2022, 148: 107739. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Antony K, Rakeshnath T R. Dissimilar laser welding of commercially pure copper and stainless steel 316L[J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020, 26: 369-372. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhao H Y, Niu W C, Zhang B, et al. Modelling of keyhole dynamics and porosity formation considering the adaptive keyhole shape and three-phasecoupling during deep-penetra-tion laser welding[J]. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2011, 44(48): 1-13. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen J Y, Wang X N, Lü F, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of welded joints of low carbon steels welded by laser beam oscillating welding[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2020, 47(3): 143-150(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  6. Gu X Y, Cui Z W, Gu X P, et al. Wire-feeding laser welding of copper/stainless steel using different filler metals[J]. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021, 14(9): 2122. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hu C J, Yan F, Zhu Z W, et al. Effects on microstructural refinement of mechanical properties in steel‑copper joints laser welded with alternating magnetic field augmentation[J]. Materials Characterization, 2021, 175: 111059. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang T H, Mishra R. Effect of stress concentration on strength and fracture behavior of dissimilar metal joints [C]//The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 33-39. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nguyen Q, Azadkhou A, Akbari M, et al. Experimental investigation of temperature field and fusion zone microstructure in dissimilar pulsed laser welding of austenitic stainless steel and copper[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2020, 56: 206-215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sun L, Xu Z T, Peng L F, et al. Effect of grain size on the ductile-brittle fracture behavior of commercially pure titanium sheet metals[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2021, 822: 141630. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ebrahimzadeh H, Mousavi S A A A. Investigation on pulsed Nd: YAG laser welding of 49Ni-Fe soft magnetic alloy[J]. Materials & Design, 2012, 38: 115-123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gao M, Zhang Y Z, Meng Y F. Interface homogenization and its relationship with tensile properties of laser-arc hybrid welded Al/steel butt-joint via beam oscillation[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2021, 56(25): 14126-14138. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen S H, Huang J H, Xia J. Influence of processing parameters on the characteristics of stainless steel/copper laser welding[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2015, 222: 43-51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuryntsev S V, Morushkin A E, Gilmutdinov A K. Fiber laser welding of austenitic steel and commercially pure copper butt joint[J]. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2017, 90: 101-109. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen S H, Huang J H, Xia J, et al. Microstructural characteristics of a stainless steel/copper dissimilar joint made by laser welding[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2013, 44(8): 3690-3696. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Phanikumar G, Manjini S, Dutta P, et al. Characterization of a continuous CO2 laser-welded Fe-Cu dissimilar couple[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2005, 36A: 2137-2147. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hagenlocher C, Sommer M, Fetzer F, et al. Optimization of the solidification conditions by means of beam oscillation during laser beam welding of aluminum[J]. Materials & Design, 2018, 160: 1178-1185. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bahrami Balajaddeh M, Naffakh-Moosavy H. Pulsed Nd: YAG laser welding of 17-4 PH stainless steel: Microstructure, mechanical properties, and weldability investigation[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2019, 119: 105651. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ozsoy A, Tureyen E B, Baskan M, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of hybrid additive manufactured dissimilar 17-4 PH and 316L stainless steels[J]. Materials Today Communications, 2021, 28: 102561. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tomashchuk I, Sallamand P, Andrzejewski H, et al. The formation of intermetallics in dissimilar Ti6Al4V/copper/AISI 316L electron beam and Nd: YAG laser joints[J]. Intermetallics, 2011, 19(10): 1466-1473. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shamsolhodaei A, Oliveira J P, Schell N, et al. Controlling intermetallic compounds formation during laser welding of NiTi to 316L stainless steel[J]. Intermetallics, 2020, 116: 106656. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mai T A, Spowage A C. Characterisation of dissimilar joints in laser welding of steel-kovar, copper-steel and copper-aluminium[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2004, 374(1): 224-233. [Google Scholar]
  23. Han Y L, Xue S B, Fu R L, et al. Effect of hydrogen content in ER5183 welding wire on the tensile strength and fracture morphology of Al-Mg MIG weld[J]. Vacuum, 2019, 166: 218-225. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li J M, Cai Y Z, Yan F, et al. Porosity and liquation cracking of dissimilar Nd: YAG laser welding of SUS304 stainless steel to T2 copper[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2020, 122: 105881. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.