EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 29 / No 4 (August 2024) Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci., 29 4 (2024) 301-314 References
Open Access
Issue
Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci.
Volume 29, Number 4, August 2024
Page(s) 301 - 314
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/wujns/2024294301
Published online 04 September 2024
  1. Gong F Y, Liu Y, You Z P, et al. Characterization and evaluation of morphological features for aggregate in asphalt mixture: A review[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 273: 121989. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bessa I S, Branco V T F C, Soares J B, et al. Aggregate shape properties and their influence on the behavior of hot-mix asphalt[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2015, 27(7): 04014212 . [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sun Z Y, Wang C F, Hao X L, et al. Quantitative evaluation for shape characteristics of aggregate particles based on 3D point cloud data[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 263: 120156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sun Z Y, Liu H Y, Ju H Y, et al. Assessment of importance-based machine learning feature selection methods for aggregate size distribution measurement in a 3D binocular vision system[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 306: 124894. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ge H T, Sha A M, Han Z Q, et al. Three-dimensional characterization of morphology and abrasion decay laws for coarse aggregates[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 188: 58-67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Anochie-Boateng J K, Komba J J, Mvelase G M. Three-dimensional laser scanning technique to quantify aggregate and ballast shape properties[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 43: 389-398. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Li Q J, Zhan Y, Yang G W, et al. 3D characterization of aggregates for pavement skid resistance[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 2019, 145(2): 04019002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang H F, Wu Z J, He Z C, et al. Detection of HF-ERW process by 3D bead shape measurement with line-structured laser vision[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2021, 21(6): 7681-7690. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang H F, Wang Y F, Zhang J J, et al. Laser stripe center detection under the condition of uneven scattering metal surface for geometric measurement[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2020, 69(5): 2182-2192. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tuan N M, Kim Y, Lee J Y, et al. Automatic stereo vision-based inspection system for particle shape analysis of coarse aggregates[J]. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2022, 36(2): 04021034 . [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Su D, Yan W M. 3D characterization of general-shape sand particles using microfocus X-ray computed tomography and spherical harmonic functions, and particle regeneration using multivariate random vector[J]. Powder Technology, 2018, 323: 8-23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu B, Fan H M, Jiang Y, et al. Evaluation of soil macro-aggregate characteristics in response to soil macropore characteristics investigated by X-ray computed tomography under freeze-thaw effects[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2023, 225: 105559. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhao L H, Zhang S H, Huang D L, et al. 3D shape quantification and random packing simulation of rock aggregates using photogrammetry-based reconstruction and discrete element method[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 262: 119986. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen Z Q, Jia Y S, Wang S Q, et al. Image-based methods for automatic identification of elongated and flat aggregate particles[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 382: 131187. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pei L L, Sun Z Y, Yu T, et al. Pavement aggregate shape classification based on extreme gradient boosting[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 256: 119356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jin C, Wang S L, Liu P F, et al. Virtual modeling of asphalt mixture beam using density and distributional controls of aggregate contact[J]. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2023, 38(16): 2242-2256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jin C, Wang P S, Yang X, et al. Analysis on gradation parameters of asphalt mixture based on 3D virtual measurement[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2019, 36(8): 1-8(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  18. Peng Y P, Wu Z B, Cao G Z, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of wear particles by multi-view contour fitting and dense point-cloud interpolation[J]. Measurement, 2021, 181: 109638. [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu C Q, Li J, Gao J, et al. Three-dimensional texture measurement using deep learning and multi-view pavement images[J]. Measurement, 2021, 172: 108828. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wu X B, Wang J S, Li J J, et al. Retrieval of siltation 3D properties in artificially created water conveyance tunnels using image-based 3D reconstruction[J]. Measurement, 2023, 211: 112586. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang Y L, Deng N, Xin B J. Investigation of 3D surface profile reconstruction technology for automatic evaluation of fabric smoothness appearance[J]. Measurement, 2020, 166: 108264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ju X Y, Henseler H, Peng M J Q, et al. Multi-view stereophotogrammetry for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction[J]. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2016, 54(2): 475-484. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Carvajal-Ramírez F, Navarro-Ortega A D, Agüera-Vega F, et al. Virtual reconstruction of damaged archaeological sites based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Photogrammetry and 3D modelling. Study case of a southeastern Iberia production area in the Bronze Age[J]. Measurement, 2019, 136: 225-236. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li T Y, Liu S C, Bolkart T, et al. Topologically consistent multi-view face inference using volumetric sampling[C]//2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). New York: IEEE, 2021: 3804-3814. [Google Scholar]
  25. Xiong J, Zhong S, Zheng L. An automatic 3D reconstruction method based on multi-view stereo vision for the mogao grottoes[J]. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2015, XL-4/W5: 171-176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhao J, Xu P, Huang S L, et al. Underwater 3D reconstruction based on multi-view stereo[C]//Ocean Optics and Information Technology. New York: SPIE, 2018: 117-123. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ito K, Ito T, Aoki T. PM-MVS: PatchMatch multi-view stereo[J]. Machine Vision and Applications, 2023, 34(2): 32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang Z. A flexible new technique for camera calibration system[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine, 2000, 22(1): 1330-1334. [Google Scholar]
  29. Schönberger J L, Frahm J M. Structure-from-motion revisited[C]//2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). New York: IEEE, 2016: 4104-4113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Perez A J, Perez-Soler J, Perez-Cortes J C, et al. Improving multi-view camera calibration using precise location of sphere center projection[J]. Computers, 2022, 11(6): 84. [Google Scholar]
  31. Furukawa Y, Hernández C. Multi-view stereo: A tutorial[J]. Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision, 2015, 9(1/2): 1-148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Perez A J, Perez-Soler J, Perez-Cortes J C, et al. Alignment and improvement of shape-from-silhouette reconstructed 3D objects[J]. IEEE Access, 2024, 12: 76975-76985. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lorensen W E. History of the marching cubes algorithm[J]. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 2020, 40(2): 8-15. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhao W. A Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno algorithm for reliability-based design optimization[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2021, 92: 447-465. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.