EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 29 / No 4 (August 2024) Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci., 29 4 (2024) 323-337 References
Open Access
Issue
Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci.
Volume 29, Number 4, August 2024
Page(s) 323 - 337
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/wujns/2024294323
Published online 04 September 2024
  1. Li B H, Chai X D, Hou B C, et al. Cloud manufacturing system 3.0—New intelligent manufacturing system in the era of "intelligence+"[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2019, 25(12): 2997-3012(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  2. Li X B, Zhuang P J, Yin C. A metadata based manufacturing resource ontology modeling in cloud manufacturing systems[J]. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2019, 10(3): 1039-1047. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yao J, Xing B, Zeng J, et al. Overview of cloud manufacturing service portfolio research[J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(7): 245-255(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  4. Bouzary H, Chen F F. Service optimal selection and composition in cloud manufacturing: A comprehensive survey[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, 97(1): 795-808. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhou J J, Yao X F. A hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm for optimal selection of QoS-based cloud manufacturing service composition[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 88(9): 3371-3387. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jin H, Lv S P, Yang Z, et al. Eagle strategy using uniform mutation and modified whale optimization algorithm for QoS-aware cloud service composition[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2022, 114: 108053. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jiang Y R, Tang L, Liu H L, et al. A variable-length encoding genetic algorithm for incremental service composition in uncertain environments for cloud manufacturing[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2022, 123: 108902. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yang Y F, Yang B, Wang S L, et al. An improved grey wolf optimizer algorithm for energy-aware service composition in cloud manufacturing[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2019, 105(7): 3079-3091. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liao S C, Sun P, Liu X C. Service combinatorial optimization based on improved krill swarm algorithm [J]. Computer Application, 2021, 41(12): 3652-3657(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  10. Zeng J, Yao J, Gao M, et al. A service composition method using improved hybrid teaching learning optimization algorithm in cloud manufacturing[J]. Journal of Cloud Computing, 2022, 11(1): 66. [Google Scholar]
  11. Liao W L, Wei L, Wang Y. Manufacturing cloud service composition optimization based on modified polar bear algorithm[J]. Computer Application Research, 2022, 39(4): 1099-1104(Ch). [Google Scholar]
  12. Xue J K, Shen B. A novel swarm intelligence optimization approach: Sparrow search algorithm[J]. Systems Science & Control Engineering, 2020, 8(1): 22-34. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tao F, Zhao D M, Hu Y F, et al. Correlation-aware resource service composition and optimal-selection in manufacturing grid[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 201(1): 129-143. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhou J J, Yao X F. Multi-population parallel self-adaptive differential artificial bee colony algorithm with application in large-scale service composition for cloud manufacturing[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2017, 56(C): 379-397. [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu G Y, Shu C, Liang Z W, et al. A modified sparrow search algorithm with application in 3d route planning for UAV[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(4): 1224. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhu Y L, Yousefi N. Optimal parameter identification of PEMFC stacks using adaptive sparrow search algorithm[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(14): 9541-9552. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Storn R, Price K. Differential evolution—A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces[J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 1997, 11: 341-359. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.