Open Access
| Issue |
Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci.
Volume 31, Number 1, February 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 35 - 44 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/wujns/2026311035 | |
| Published online | 06 March 2026 | |
- He Z Y, Liu Q W. Optical fiber distributed acoustic sensors: A review[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2021, 39(12): 3671-3686. [Google Scholar]
- Fu S C, Zhang D, Peng Y, et al. A simulation of gas pipeline leakage monitoring based on distributed acoustic sensing[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2022, 33(9): 095108. [Google Scholar]
- Fernández-Ruiz M R, Soto M A, Williams E F, et al. Distributed acoustic sensing for seismic activity monitoring[J]. APL Photonics, 2020, 5(3): 030901. [Google Scholar]
- Wu Y Y, Gao L, Chai J, et al. Overview of health-monitoring technology for long-distance transportation pipeline and progress in DAS technology application[J]. Sensors, 2024, 24(2): 413. [Google Scholar]
- Zhong R J, Chen S K, Liu Z Q, et al. Intrusion identification method for φ-OTDR systems based on few-shot and multi-task learning[C]//2024 IEEE 6th Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC). New York: IEEE, 2024: 1353-1360. [Google Scholar]
- Kandamali D F, Cao X M, Tian M L, et al. Machine learning methods for identification and classification of events in φ-OTDR systems: A review[J]. Applied Optics, 2022, 61(11): 2975-2997. [Google Scholar]
- Wang M, Feng H, Qi D Z, et al. φ-OTDR pattern recognition based on CNN-LSTM[J]. Optik, 2023, 272: 170380. [Google Scholar]
- Li J, Wang L Q, Liu J, et al. Distributed fiber optic vibration sensing event recognition method based on CNN-LSTM-transformer net[J]. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 2025, 30(4): 321-333. [Google Scholar]
- Duan J Y, Chen J G, He Z Y. DAS-MAE: A self-supervised pre-training framework for universal and high-performance representation learning of distributed fiber-optic acoustic sensing[EB/OL]. [2025-06-05]. arXiv:2506.04552. [Google Scholar]
- Szegedy C, Ioffe S, Vanhoucke V, et al. Inception-v4, inception-ResNet and the impact of residual connections on learning[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017, 31(1): 4278-4284. [Google Scholar]
- Paul S, Das R, Malviya V, et al. Comparative analysis of transfer learning and few-shot learning with CNN architectures for chest X-ray classification under data constraints[J]. Informatica, 2025, 49(4): 1-12. [Google Scholar]
- Umapathi K, Vanithamani R, Priya L, et al. Effective skin cancer classification by modified and optimized inception-ResNet-V2 model[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1): 41150. [Google Scholar]
- Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y Q, et al. Going deeper with convolutions[C]//2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). New York: IEEE, 2015: 1-9. [Google Scholar]
- He K M, Zhang X Y, Ren S Q, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]//2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). New York: IEEE, 2016: 770-778. [Google Scholar]
- Cao X M, Su Y S, Jin Z Y, et al. An open dataset of φ-OTDR events with two classification models as baselines[J]. Results in Optics, 2023, 10: 100372. [Google Scholar]
- Loshchilov I, Hutter F. SGDR: Stochastic gradient descent with warm restarts[EB/OL]. [2024-10-05]. arXiv:1608.03983. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.