Open Access
 Issue Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci. Volume 27, Number 1, March 2022 35 - 41 https://doi.org/10.1051/wujns/2022271035 16 March 2022

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## 0 Introduction

A function z defined on a lattice and taking values in an Aabelian semigroup is called a valuation if(1)for all . A function z defined on some subset of L is called a valuation on if (1) holds whenever . For the set of convex bodies, , in with denoting union and intersection. Valuation on convex bodies is a classical concept. Probably the most famous result on valuations is Hadwiger’s classification theorem of continuous rigid motion invariant valuations[1]. For the more recent contributions on valuations on convex bodies readers can refer to Refs. [2-33].

Valuations on convex bodies can be considered as valuations on suitable function spaces. Recently, valuations on functions have been rapidly growing (see Refs. [34-55]). For a space of real-valued functions, the operations and are defined as pointwise maximum and minimum, respectively. A complete classification of valuations intertwining with the SL(n) on Sobolev space [46-49] and space [45,50-52,54] were established, respectively. Valuations on convex functions [34,36,39-42], quasi-concave functions [37,38], Lipschitz functions [43,44], and functions of Bounded variations [53] were introduced and classified.

Recently, Wang and Liu [55] showed that the Fourier transform is the only valuation which is a continuous, positive GL(n) covariant and logarithmic translation covariant complex-valued valuation on integral functions. This motivates the study of complex-valued valuations on functions.

Let L be a lattice of complex-valued functions. For , let and denote the real and imaginary parts of f, respectively. The pointwise maximum of f and g, and the pointwise minimum of f and g are defined by(2)and(3)If f, g are real-valued functions, then (2) and (3) coincide with the real cases. A function is called a valuation iffor all and if . It is called continuous ifIt is called translation invariant iffor every . It is called rotation invariant iffor every , where denotes the inverse of .

Let . If is a measure space, then the -space, is the collection of µ-measurable complex-valued functions that satisfiesA measure space is called non-atomic if for every with , there exists with and . Let denote the characteristic function of the measurable set E, i.e.

Theorem 1  　Let be a non-atomic measure space and let be a continuous valuation. If there exist continuous functions with (k=1,2,3,4) such that for all and all with , then there exist constants such that for , andfor all . In addition, (k = 1,2,3,4) if .

Let denote the -space of Lebesgue measurable complex-valued functions on .

Theorem 2  　A function is a continuous translation invariant valuation if and only if there exist continuous functions with the property that there exist constants such that for all (k = 1,2,3,4), and(4)for all .

Let be the unit sphere in and let denote the -space of spherical Lebesgue measurable complex-valued functions on .

Theorem 3  　A function is a continuous rotation invariant valuation if and only if there exist continuous functions with the properties that and there exist constants such that for all (k = 1,2,3,4), and(5)for all .

## 1 Notation and Preliminary Results

We collect some properties of complex-valued functions. If f is a complex-valued function on , thenwhere and denote the real part and imaginary part of f, respectively. The absolute value of f which is also called modulus is defined byLet . For a measure space , define as the space of µ-measurable complex-valued functions that satisfiesLet , then . The functional is a semi-norm. If functions in that are equal almost everywhere with respect to are identified, then becomes a norm. Obviously, is a lattice of complex-valued functions. Let denote the subset of , where the functions take real values. For , if , then in . Moreover,

The following characterizations of real-valued valuations on functions which were established by Tsang [51] will play key role in our proof. Let and denote the space of Lebesgue measurable real-valued functions on and the space of spherical Lebesgue measurable real-valued functions on ，respectively.

Theorem 4  [51]　A function is a continuous translation invariant valuation if and only if there exists a continuous function with the property that there exists a constant such that for all , andfor all .

Theorem 5  [51]　A function is a continuous rotation invariant valuation if and only if there exists a continuous function with the properties that and there exist constants such that for all , andfor all .

## 2 Main Results

Lemma 1  　Let be continuous functions with the properties that and there exist such that for all (k =1,...,4). If the function is defined by(6)then is a continuous valuation provided that if .

Proof  　For , letBy (6) and (2), we obtainSimilarly, by (6) and (3), we haveNote that and that E, F, G, H are pairwise disjoints. Thus,Hence is a valuation.

It remains to show that is continuous. Let and let be a sequence in with in . Next, we will show that converges to by showing that every subsequence of has a subsequence, which converges to . Set and with such that and in . Let be a subsequence of , then converges to f in . Then there exists a subsequence of which converges to f in , where with such that and in . Since is continuous, we haveSince for all , we getIf , apply in to getAnd we take in the above equation if . By a modification of Lebesgue’s Dominated Convergence Theorem (see Ref.[51], Proposition 2.2), we have and(7)Similarly,(8)(9)(10)Thus,From (7)-(10), we conclude . Hence, is continuous.

Lemma 2  　 If the function is a valuation, thenfor all .

Proof  　If or , then, by (2) and (3), we have(11)If or , then, by (2) and (3), we have(12)Note that , apply (11) and (12), then getfor all .

If we restrict f to , then it is obvious that is a valuation on . Also, we can construct another valuation on which is related to .

Lemma 3  　Let be a valuation. If the functions is defined byfor all , then is a valuation on .

Proof  　For , by (2) and (3), we have(13)By (13) and the valuation property of , it follows thatfor all . Thus, is a valuation on .

Lemma 4  　Let be a valuation. If the functions are defined byfor all , then both are real-valued valuations on .

Proof  　Since is a valuation, we havefor all . Thus,andfor all .

Therefore, both are real-valued valuations on .

In order to establish a representation theorem for continuous complex-valued valuations on , we will use the corresponding representation theorem for real case which was obtained by Tsang [51].

Theorem 6  [51]　Let be a non-atomic measure space and let be a continuous translation invariant valuation. If there exists a continuous function with such that for all and all with , then there exist constants such that for all , andfor all . In addition, if .

Proof of Theorem 1

Let be a continuous valuation. For , by Lemma 2, Lemma 3 and Lemma 4, we havewhere and .

Since . Moreover, Lemma 3 and Lemma 4 imply that are real-valued valuations on .

If we restrict to , then the continuity of implies that are continuous on .

If we consider with , then the continuity of implies that are continuous on . Thus, are continuous real-valued valuations on . It follows from Theorem 6 that there exist continuous functions with the properties that and there exist constants such that for all (k = 1,2,3,4), andfor all . In addition, (k = 1,2,3,4) if .

If µ is Lebesgue measure, then becomes the space of Lebesgue measurable complex-valued functions. We usually write as .

Lemma 5  　Let be continuous functions with the property that there exists such that for all (k = 1,...,4). If the function is defined byThen is a continuous translation invariant valuation.

Proof  　 Let M enote the collection of Lebesgue measurable sets in . Take and µ Lebesgue measure in Lemma 1 to conclude that is a continuous valuation on .

For every and every , we havewhich means that is translation invariant.

Proof of Theorem 2

It follows from Lemma 5 that (4) determines a continuous translation invariant valuation on . Conversely, let be a continuous translation invariant valuation. Taking and µ Lebesgue measure in the proof of Theorem 1, we obtainwhere are real-valued valuations on . Theorem 4 implies that there exist continuous functions with the property that there exist constants such that for all (k = 1,2,3,4), andfor all .

Let W denote the -algebra defined as

Also denote by the spherical Lebesgue measure. If µ is the spherical Lebesgue measure, then denotes the space of spherical Lebesgue measurable complex valued functions. We usually write as .

Lemma 6  　Let be continuous functions with the properties that and there exists such that for all (k=1,...,4). If the function is defined bythen is a continuous rotation invariant valuation.

Proof  　Take and in Lemma 1 to conclude that is a continuous valuation on .

Note that for every and every . Since the spherical Lebesgue measure is rotation invariant, we havefor all , which completes the proof.

Proof of Theorem 3

It follows from Lemma 6 that (5) determines a continuous rotation invariant valuation on .

Conversely, let be a continuous rotation invariant valuation. Taking and in the proof of Theorem 1, we obtainwhere are real-valued valuations on .

Theorem 5 implies that there exist continuous functions with the properties that and there exist constants such that for all (k = 1,2,3,4), andfor all .

## References

1. Hadwiger H. Vorlensungen über Inhalt, Oberfläche und Isoperimetrie [M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1957. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Alesker S. Continuous rotation invariant valuations on convex sets [J]. Ann of Math, 1999, 149(3): 977-1005. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
3. Alesker S. Description of translation invariant valuations on convex sets with solution of P. McMullen’s conjecture [J]. Geom Funct Anal, 2001, 11(2): 244-272. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
4. Alesker S, Bernig A, Schuster F E. Harmonic analysis of translation invariant valuations [J]. Geom Funct Anal, 2011, 21(4): 751-773. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
5. Bernig A , Fu J H G. Hermitian integral geometry [J]. Ann of Math, 2011, 173(2): 907-945. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
6. Gruber P. Convex and Discrete Geometry [M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2007. [Google Scholar]
7. Haberl C. Blaschke valuations [J]. Amer J Math, 2011, 133(3): 717-751. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
8. Haberl C. Minkowski valuations intertwining the special linear group [J]. J Eur Math Soc, 2012, 14(5): 1565-1597. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
9. Haberl C, Ludwig M. A characterization of Lp intersection bodies[J]. Int Math Res Not, 2006(2006): 10548. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
10. Haberl C, Parapatits L. The centro-affine Hadwiger theorem [J]. J Amer Math Soc, 2014, 27(3): 685-705. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
11. Haberl C , Parapatits L. Valuations and surface area measures [J]. J Reine Angew Math, 2014, 687: 225-245. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
12. Haberl C, Parapatits L. Moments and valuations [J]. Amer J Math, 2016, 138(6): 1575-1603. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
13. Haberl C, Parapatits L. Centro-affine tensor valuations [J]. Adv Math, 2017, 316: 806-865. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
14. Klain D A. Star valuations and dual mixed volumes [J]. Adv Math, 1996, 121(1): 80-101. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
15. Klain D A. Even valuations on convex bodies [J]. Tran Amer Math Soc, 1999, 352: 71-93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
16. Klain D A , Rota G C. Introduction to Geometric Probability [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. [Google Scholar]
17. Li J, Leng G S. Lp Minkowski valuations on polytopes [J]. Adv Math, 2016, 299: 139-173. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
18. Li J, Yuan S F, Leng G S. Lp-Blaschke valuations [J]. Trans Amer Math Soc, 2015, 367(5) :3161-3187. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
19. Liu L J, Wang W. SL(n) contravariant Lp harmonic valuations on polytopes [J]. Discrete Comput Geom, 2021, 66: 977-995. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
20. Ludwig M. Moment vectors of polytopes [J]. Rend Circ Mat Pale (2) Suppl, 2002, 70: 1123-138. [Google Scholar]
21. Ludwig M. Projection bodies and valuations [J]. Adv Math, 2002, 172(2): 158-168. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
22. Ludwig M. Valuations on ploytopes containing the origin in their interiors [J]. Adv Math, 2002, 170(2): 239-256. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
23. Ludwig M. Ellipsoids and matrix-valued valuations [J]. Duke Math J, 2003, 119(1): 159-188. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
24. Ludwig M. Minkowski valuations [J]. Trans Amer Math Soc, 2005, 357(10): 4191-4213. [Google Scholar]
25. Ludwig M. Intersection bodies and valuations [J]. Amer J Math, 2006, 128(6): 1409-1428. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
26. Ludwig M. Minkowski areas and valuations [J]. J Differential Geom, 2010, 86(1): 133-161. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
27. Ludwig M. Covariance matrices and valuations [J]. Adv Appl Math, 2013, 51(3): 359-366. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
28. Ludwig M, Reitzner M. A classification of SL(n) invariant valuations [J]. Ann of Math, 2010, 172(2): 1219-1267. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
29. Ludwig M, Reitzner M. SL(n) invariant valuations on polytopes [J]. Discrete Comput Geom, 2017, 57(3): 571-581. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
30. Ma D , Wang W. LYZ matrices and SL(n) contravariant valuations on polytopes [J]. Canad J Math, 2021, 73(2): 383-398. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
31. Parapatits L. SL(n)-contravariant Lp Minkowski valuations [J]. Trans Amer Math Soc, 2014, 366(3): 1195-1211. [Google Scholar]
32. Parapatits L. SL(n)-covariant Lp-Minkowski valuations [J]. J Lond Math Soc, 2014, 89(2): 397-414. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
33. Schneider R. Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory, [M]. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. [Google Scholar]
34. Alesker S. Valuations on convex functions and convex sets and Monge-Ampère operators [J]. Adv Geom, 2019, 19(3): 313-322. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
35. Baryshnikov Y, Ghrist R, Wright M. Hadwiger’s theorem for definable functions [J]. Adv Math, 2013, 245: 573-586. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
36. Cavallina L , Colesanti A. Monotone valuations on the space of convex functions [J]. Anal Geom Metr Spaces, 2015, 3(1): 167-211. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
37. Colesanti A, Lombardi N. Valuations on the space of quasi-concave functions [C]// Geometric Aspects of Functional Analysis, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 2169. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2017: 71-105. [Google Scholar]
38. Colesanti A, Lombardi N, Parapatits L. Translation invariant valuations on quasi-concave functions [J]. Studia Mathematica, 2018, 243: 79-99. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
39. Colesanti A, Ludwig M, Mussnig F. Minkowski valuations on convex functions [J]. Cala Var Partial Differential Equations, 2017, 56: 162. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Colesanti A, Ludwig M, Mussnig F. Valuations on convex functions [J]. Int Math Res Not, 2019, 8: 2384-2410. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
41. Colesanti A, Ludwig M, Mussnig F. A homogeneous decomposition theorem for valuations on convex functions [J]. J Funct Anal, 2020, 279: 108573. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
42. Colesanti A, Ludwig M, Mussnig F. Hessian valuations [J]. Indiana Univ Math J, 2020, 69: 1275-1315. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
43. Colesanti A, Pagnini D, Tradacete P, et al. A class of invariant valuations on Lip(Sn-1) [J]. Adv Math, 2020, 366: 107069. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
44. Colesanti A, Pagnini D, Tradacete P, et al. Continuous valuations on the space of Lipschitz functions on the sphere [J]. J Funct Anal, 2021, 280: 108873. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
45. Li J, Ma D. Laplace transforms and valuations [J]. J Funct Anal, 2017, 272(2): 738-758. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
46. Ludwig M. Fisher information and matrix-valued valuations [J]. Adv Math, 2011, 226(3): 2700-2711. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
47. Ludwig M. Valuations on function spaces [J]. Adv Geom, 2011, 11: 745-756. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
48. Ludwig M. Valuations on Sobolev spaces [J]. Amer J Math, 2012, 134(3): 827-842. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
49. Ma D. Real-valued valuations on Sobolev spaces [J]. Sci China Math, 2016, 59(5): 921-934. [NASA ADS] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
50. Ober M. Lp-Minkowski valuations on Lp-spaces [J]. J Math Anal Appl, 2014, 414(1): 68-87. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
51. Tsang A. Valuations on Lp-spaces [J]. Int Math Res Not, 2010, 20: 3993-4023. [Google Scholar]
52. Tsang A. Minkowski valuations on Lp-spaces [J]. Trans Amer Math Soc, 2012, 364(12): 6159-6186. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
53. Wang T. Semi-valuations on BV(Rn) [J]. Indiana Univ Math J, 2014, 63(5): 1447-1465. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
54. Wang W, He R J, Liu L. SL(n) covariant vector-valued valuations on Lp spaces [J]. Ann Math Qué, 2021, 45: 465-486. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
55. Wang W, Liu L J. Fourier transform and valuations [J]. J Math Anal Appl, 2019, 470(2): 1167-1184. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.