Open Access
Issue
Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci.
Volume 26, Number 6, December 2021
Page(s) 473 - 480
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/wujns/2021266473
Published online 17 December 2021
  1. Huacarpuma R C, de Sousa Junior R T, de Holanda M T, et al. Distributed data service for data management in Internet of Things middleware [J]. Sensors, 2017,17: 1-25. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dave B, Buda A, Nurminen A, et al. A framework for integrating BIM and IoT through open standards [J]. Automation in Construction, 2018, 95: 35-45. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sallow A B. Design and implementation distributed system using Java-RMI middleware [J]. Academic Journal of Nawroz University, 2020, 9: 113-120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fersi G. Study of middleware for Internet of healthcare things and their applications [C]// 2020 International Conference on Smart Living and Public Health. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2020: 223-231. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rosa N, Cavalcanti D, Campos G, et al. Adaptive middleware in go—A software architecture-based approach [J]. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 2020, 11(1): 1-23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Qu W Q, Zhou C L, Zhang Q, et al. Scheme of IoT middleware based on message service [J]. UPB Scientific Bulletin Series C, 2019, 81(1): 16-26. [Google Scholar]
  7. Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G. The Internet of Things: A survey [J]. Computer Networks, 2010, 54: 2787-2805. [Google Scholar]
  8. Nguyen C N, Lee J, Hwang S, et al. On the role of message broker middleware for many-task computing on a big-data platform [J]. Cluster Computing, 2019, 22: 2527-2540. [Google Scholar]
  9. Celar S, Mudnic E, Seremet Z. State-of-the-art of messaging for distributed computing systems [J]. International Joural of Vallis Aurea, 2017(3): 5-18. [Google Scholar]
  10. da Cruz M A A, Rodrigues J J P C, Lorenz P, et al. In.IoT—A new middleware for Internet of Things [J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2021(8): 7902-7911. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yuan Z H, Pang B W, Du Y K, et al. Design and implementation of Internet of Things message subscription system based on Kafka [C]// 2019 IEEE 11th International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN) Conference. Washington D C: IEEE Press, 2019:12-15. [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu Y, Li D, Zheng C D. An improved underwater confrontation simulation method of naval amphibious operational training system [J]. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 2018, 23(3): 225-229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu Y, Wen J Y, Ji D Q. Integration of naval distributed tactical training simulation system based on advanced message queuing protocol [J]. High Technology Letters, 2016, 22(4): 385-394. [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu Y, Song J, Wen J Y. An optimizing algorithm of static task scheduling problem on hybrid genetic algorithm [J]. High Technology Letters, 2016, 22(2): 170-177. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dobbelaere P, Esmaili K S. Kafka versus RabbitMQ: A comparative study of two industry reference publish/subscribe implementations: Industry paper [C]// The 11th ACM International Conference on Distributed and Event-based Systems. New York: ACM, 2017: 227-238. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.