Issue |
Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci.
Volume 27, Number 5, October 2022
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 367 - 371 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/wujns/2022275367 | |
Published online | 11 November 2022 |
Mathematics
CLC number: O 186
The Minkowski Measure of Asymmetry for Spherical Bodies of Constant Width
School of Mathematical Sciences, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, Jiangsu, China
† To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jinhailin17@163.com
Received:
10
May
2022
In this paper, we introduce the Minkowski measure of asymmetry for the spherical bodies of constant width. Then we prove that the spherical balls are the most symmetric bodies among all spherical bodies of constant width, and the completion of the spherical regular simplexes are the most asymmetric bodies.
Key words: spherical convex body / spherical body of constant width / Minkowski measure of asymmetry / simplex / Reuleaux triangle
Biography: HOU Peiwen, female, Master candidate, research direction: convex geometric analysis. E-mail: houpeiwen6@163.com
Fundation item: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12071334, 12071277)
© Wuhan University 2022
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
0 Introduction
The Minkowski measure of asymmetry of convex bodies in the Euclidean space was introduced by Minkowski[1]. It is well-known that the
-dimensional simplex has the biggest Minkowski measure
of asymmetry. In other words, we always say that the simplex is the most asymmetric convex body. There are many other measures of asymmetry for convex bodies, such as the Winternitz measure of symmetry, the Kovner-Besicovitch measure of symmetry, and the mean Minkowski measure of asymmetry. For the new development of the research of the Minkowski measure of asymmetry, see Refs.[2-7].
The Convex bodies of constant width are important ones in . The symmetry of convex bodies of constant width in
was studied by Besicovitch[8], who showed that the Reuleaux triangles are the most asymmetric convex bodies of constant width in
, and the circles are the most symmetric convex bodies of constant width in
. A special measure of asymmetry for convex bodies of constant width in
was introduced by Groemer and Wallen[9]. The Minkowski measure of asymmetry for convex bodies of constant width was studied by Guo and Jin[3, 5, 6, 10, 11]. In the sense of Minkowski measure of asymmetry, the complete bodies of the regular simplex are the most asymmetric convex bodies of constant width, and the Euclidean balls are the most symmetric convex bodies of constant width.
The convex geometry in the n-dimensional spherical space was investigated by many mathematician, such as Robinson, Santaló, Dekster, Leichtweiss[12- 16], Lassak[17] and Guo[10]. In this paper, we introduce the Minkowski measure of asymmetry for spherical convex bodies of constant width in
. Then we prove a spherical analogy of a result obtained by Jin and Guo[11, 18], i.e. that the spherical balls are the most symmetric bodies among all spherical bodies of constant width, and the completions of the spherical regular simplex are the most asymmetric bodies. Concretely, we give the following theorem.
Main Theorem Let be a spherical body of constant width. Then the Minkowski measure
of asymmetry of
satisfies the following inequality:
The equality holds on the left-hand side if and only if is a spherical ball, and on the right-hand side if and only if
is a completion of a spherical regular simplex.
1 Preliminaries
Let denote the class of convex bodies (compact convex sets with nonempty interiors) in
, and let
denote the class of sets in
which contain the origin in their interiors. The convex body
is said to be of constant width
if its projection on any straight line is a segment of length
, which is equivalent to the geometrical fact that any two parallel support hyperplanes of
are always at the distance
. The convex bodies of constant width in
and
are also called orbiforms and spheroforms,respectively. Euclidean balls are obviously bodies of constant width, however, there are many others[19]. We denote by
the set of all
-dimensional convex bodies of constant width.
Convex bodies of constant width have many interesting properties and applications which have gained much attention in the history, e.g., orbiforms were intensely studied during the nineteenth century and later, particularly by Reuleaux, whose name is now attached to the orbiforms obtained by intersecting a finite number of disks of equal radii. In , Meissner tetrahedrons may be the most famous spheroforms. Mathematicians believe that Meissner tetrahedrons have the minimal volume among all spheroforms of the same width.
Given a convex body and
. For a hyperplane
through
and the pair of support hyperplanes
,
(of
) parallel to
, let
be the ratio, not less than 1, in which
divides the distance between
and
. Put
and define the Minkowski measure of asymmetry of
by
A point satisfying
is called a critical point of C. The set of all critical points of
is denoted by
. It is known that
is a non-empty convex set.
If , then
Equality holds on the left-hand side if and only if is centrally symmetric, and on the right-hand side if and only if
is a simplex.
The Minkowski measure of asymmetry for convex bodies of constant width was studied by Jin and Guo[11, 18].
The critical set of
is a singleton, and the unique critical point of
is the center of circumscribed sphere of
, also the center of inscribed sphere of
. Denoted by
and
be the radii of insphere and circumsphere of
, respectively. For
, we have
. By Jung's theorem, we have
The equality holds on the left-hand side if and only if is an Euclidean ball, and on the right-hand side if and only if
is a completion of a regular simplex.
In , a completion of a convex body
is a convex body of constant width, which has the same diameter as
.
2 Spherical Bodies of Constant Width
Let be the unit sphere of the
-dimensional Euclidean space
, where
. The intersection of
with an
-dimensional subspace of
, where
, is called an
-dimensional subsphereof
. In particular, if
, we get the 0-dimensional subsphere consisting of a pair of antipodal points, and if
we obtain the so-called great circle.
If are not antipodes, by the arc
connecting them we mean the shorter part of the great circle containing
and
. By the spherical distance
, or distance in short, of these points we know the length of the arc connecting them. Clearly
, the angel between vectors
,
, where
is the center of
. The diameterdiam(
) of a set
is the supremum of the spherical distances between pairs of points in
.
By a spherical ball of radius, or an s-ballin short, we understand the set of points of
having distance at most
from a fixed point, called the center of this ball. Spherical balls of radius
are called hemispheres. In other words, by a hemisphere of
we mean the common part of
with any closed half-space of
. We denote by
the hemisphere whose center is
. Two hemispheres whose centers are antipodes are called opposite hemispheres.
By a spherical-dimensional ball of radius
we mean the set of points of a
-dimensional sphere of
which are at distance at most
from a fixed point, called the center of this ball. The
-dimensional balls of radius
are called
-dimensional hemisphere. If
, we call them semi-circles.
We say that a set is s-convex if it does not contain any pair of antipodes, and if together with for every two points of
, the whole arc connecting them is a subset of
. By an s-convex body on
we mean a closed convex set with non-empty interior.
If an -dimensional sphere
of
has a common point
with a convex body
and its intersection with the interior of
is empty, we say that
is a supporting hypersphere of
passing through
. We also say that
supports
at
. If
is the hemisphere bounded by
and containing
, we say that
is a supporting hemisphere of
and that
supports
at
.
For any distinct non-opposite hemispheres and
the set
is called a lune of
. The
-dimensional hemispheres bounding the lune which are contained in
and
, respectively, are denoted by
and
. By the thickness
of a lune
we mean the spherical distance of the centers of the
-dimensional hemispheres
and
bounding
[20].
We say that a lune passes through a boundary point of a convex body
if the lune contains
and if the boundary of the lune contains
. If the centers of both
-dimensional hemispheres bounding a lune belong to
, then we call such a lune an orthogonally supporting lune of
.
For an s-convex body and any hemisphere
supporting
we define the width of
determined by
, denoted by
, as the minimum thickness of a lune
over all hemispheres
supporting
[20]. By a compactness argument we see that at least one such a hemisphere
exists, and thus at least one corresponding lune
exists. We say that a convex body
is of constant width
provided for every supporting hemisphere
of
we have
[20].
Lemma 1[17, 20]
Every two convex sets on with disjoint interiors are subsets of two oppositehemispheres.
Lemma 2[17]If is a body of constant width
, then
.
We say that a convex body with diameter
is of constant diameter
provided that for arbitrary
there exists
such that
[20, 21]. We say that any subset of a hemisphere of
which is the largest (in the sense of inclusion) set of a given diameter
is acomplete set of diameter
, or a complete set for brevity.
Lemma 3[17]
(i) Bodies of constant diameter oncoincide with complete bodies;
(ii) Bodies of constant diameter on coincide with bodies of constant width.
3 The Circumscribed Ball of Spherical Body of Constant Width
In the -dimensional Euclidean space
, if
is a convex bodies of constant width
, then the insphere and circumsphere are concentric and their radii,
and
, respectively, satisfy
and
In this section, we give a similar result of spherical bodies of constant width to the one for convex bodies in Euclidean spaces. The following results and approach of their proofs are implied vaguely in Ref.[22].
For and
, denote
, the spherical ball with radius
and centered at
.
Lemma 4 Letbe an s-convex body with diameter
. If
, then
.
Proof Suppose does not contain
. Let
and let
be the great circle through
and
. Take the point
being the intersection of
with
such that
is in-between
and
, i.e.
locates on the short arc connecting
and
, and take
such that
is in-between
and
. Then
and hence
, contradicting the fact that the diameter of
is
.
Lemma 5 Letbe an s-convex body of constant width
. If
, then
.
Proof Suppose there is a point of
that is not in
. Let
be the great circle through
and
. By Lemma 1, there exist two opposite hemispheres
and
such that
,
and
is perpendicular to
. Let
,
be the two intersecting points of
with the boundary of
, such that
is in-between
and
. Let
be a point of the intersection of
with
such that
is in-between
and
. Let
be the unique hemisphere supports
at
. Then the lune
contains
. Notice that the thickness of the lune
is less than
, which implies that
is not a spherical body of constant width.
Theorem 1 Letbe an s-convex body of constant width
. Then the insphere and circumsphere of
are concentric, and the sum of their radii is
.
Proof Let be a spherical body of constant width, and
be its circumsphere, where
. Since the diameter of
is
, we have
. Let
be the ball concentric with
having radius
. By Lemma 5,
is contained in
. We will prove that
is an insphere of
and is unique. Suppose that it is not; then there is a ball
different from
, with radius
. Then, by Lemma 4, there exists a sphere
concentric with
and having radius
, which is a contradiction, since
and
is different from
.
Remark 1 Bodies of constant width in an
-dimensional Riemannian manifold
were introduced and studied by Dekster[12]. Then Dekster studied the incenter and circumcenter of bodies
of constant width in
. He proved that each circumcenter of
is an incenter and vice versa, and the inradius
and circumradius
fulfill
.
The following is the theorem of Jung's type for spherical space.
Theorem 2 [13] Letbe a compact set in
of diameter
and circumradius
. Let
be a ball of radius
containing
. Then
(ii)if and only if there exist
points on the boundary of
such that these points are of equidistant
. In other words,
contains an
-dimensional spherical regular simplex with diameter
.
Remark 2 The definition of body of constant width in Theorem 2 is similar to the definition of body of constant diameter in Section 2. By Lemma 3, we know that the two notions coincide.
4 The Minkowski Measure of Spherical Body of Constant Width
In this section, we firstly give a definition of the Minkowski measure of asymmetry of spherical body of constant width, then we prove the main Theorem given in Section 0, that is Theorem 3 in this section.
Definition 1 Denote bybe an s-convex body of constant width
. Let
be the radius of the circumsphere of
. The Minkowski measure of asymmetry of
is defined by
Remark 3
(i) We have not found a suitable definition of the Minkowski measure of asymmetry for general spherical convex bodies;
(ii) The Definition 1 is motivated by the work of Brandenberg and Merino[2].
In the following, we prove our main result.
Theorem 3 Let be an s-convex body of constant width. Then,
The equality holds on the left-hand side if and only if is a spherical ball, and on the right-hand side if and only if
is a completion of a spherical regular simplex.
Proof Let be the constant width of
, and
,
the radii of the insphere, circumsphere respectively. Then
, which implies that
. We have
if and only if
. Hence,
if and only if
is a spherical ball.
By Theorem 2, we have , then
By Theorem 2, the equality holds in the above inequality if and only if contains a spherical regular simplex of diameter
, which implies that
is a completion of a spherical regular simplex.
Corollary 1 Letbe an s-convex body of constant width. Then,
The equality holds on the left-hand side if and only ifis a spherical disc, and on the right-hand side if and only if
is a spherical Reuleaux triangle.
References
- Grünbaum B. Measures of symmetry for convex sets[C]//Convexity, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics 7. Providence : American Math Society, 1963: 233-270. [Google Scholar]
- Brandenberg R, Merino B G. The asymmetry of complete and constant width bodies in general normed spaces and the Jung constant[J].Israel Journal of Mathematics, 2017, 218(1): 489-510. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Guo Q. On p-measures of asymmetry for convex bodies[J]. Adv Geom, 2012, 12(2): 287-301. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Guo Q, Guo J, Su X. The measures of asymmetry for coproducts of convex bodies[J]. Pacific J Math, 2015, 276(2): 401-418. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Jin H L. The log-Minkowski measure of asymmetry for convex bodies [J]. Geom Dedicata, 2018, 196(1): 27-34. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Jin H L. Electrostatic capacity and measure of asymmetry[J]. Proc Amer Math Soc, 2019, 147(9): 4007-4019. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Töth G. Measures of Symmetry for Convex Sets and Stability[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Besicovitch A S. Measures of asymmetry for convex curves, II. Curves of constant width[J]. J Lond Math Soc, 1951, 26(2): 81-93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Groemer H, Wallen L J. A measure of asymmetry for domains of contant width[J]. Beitr Algebre Geom, 2001, 26:517-521. [Google Scholar]
- Guo Q. Convexity theory on spherical spaces[J]. Science in China (Series A), 2020, 50(12):1745-1772. [Google Scholar]
- Jin H L, Guo Q. Asymmetry of convex bodies of constant width[J]. Discrete Comput Geom, 2012, 47(2): 415-423. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Dekster B V. In- and circumcenters of manifolds of constant width[J]. Geom Dedicata, 1991, 38(1): 67-71. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Dekster B V. The Jung theorem for spherical and hyperbolic spaces[J]. Acta Math Hungar, 1995, 67(4): 315-331. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Leichtweiss K. Curves of contant width in the non-Euclidean geometry[J]. Abh Math Sem Univ Hamburg, 2005,75(1): 257-284 . [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson R M. Note on convex regins on the sphere[J]. Bull Amer Math Soc, 1938, 44: 115-116. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Santaló L. Convex regions on the n-dimensional spherical surface[J]. Annals of Mathematics, 1946, 47(3): 448-459. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Lassak M. Spherical geometry—A survey on width and thickness of convex bodies[C]//Surveys in Geometry I. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2022: 7-47. [Google Scholar]
- Jin H L, Guo Q. A note on the extremal bodies of constant width for the Minkowski measure[J]. Geom Dedicata, 2013, 164(1): 227-229. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Chakerian G D, Groemer H. Convex bodies of constant width[C]// Convexity and Its Applications. Basel: Birkhäuser Basel, 1983: 49-96. [Google Scholar]
- Lassak M. Width of spherical convex bodies[J]. Aequat Math, 2015, 89(3): 555-567. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lassak M, Musielak M. Spherical bodies of constant width[J]. Aequat Math, 2018, 92(4): 627-640. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Martini H, Montejano L, Oliveros D. Bodies of Constant Width: An Introduction to Convex Geometry with Applications[M]. Cham: Springer -Verlag, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.